As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 30, 2007
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
Under
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
OCULUS INNOVATIVE SCIENCES,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
3841
|
|
68-0423298
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1129 N. McDowell Blvd.
Petaluma, CA 94954
(707) 782-0792
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
Hojabr Alimi
Chief Executive Officer
1129 N. McDowell Blvd.
Petaluma, CA 94954
(707) 782-0792
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent
for service)
Copies to:
Sylvia K. Burks, Esq.
Gabriella A. Lombardi, Esq.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114
(650) 233-4500
(650) 233-4545 facsimile
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: From time to time after the Registration
Statement becomes effective as described in the Prospectus.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box. þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)
|
|
|
per Share(2)
|
|
|
Offering Price(1)
|
|
|
Fee
|
|
Common Stock ($0.0001 par
value)
|
|
|
3,249,860 shares
|
|
|
$7.22
|
|
|
$23,463,989
|
|
|
$720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 1,760,906 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding warrants. Pursuant to Rule 416,
this Registration Statement also covers such indeterminable
additional shares as may become issuable as a result of the
operation of any anti-dilution provisions of such warrants. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of
the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) based on the
average of the high and low prices of the Registrants
common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on
August 28, 2007. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. The selling security holders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not
soliciting any offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
AUGUST 30, 2007
PROSPECTUS
3,249,860 Shares
Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the disposition of up to
3,249,860 shares of our common stock, or interests therein,
by the selling stockholders listed in the section beginning on
page 24 of this prospectus, including 1,760,906 shares
of our common stock issuable to the selling stockholders upon
the exercise of warrants to purchase our common stock. The
selling stockholders may dispose of such shares or interests
therein, from time to time on any stock exchange, market or
trading facility on which the common stock is traded or in
private transactions. These dispositions may be at fixed prices,
at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at prices
related to the prevailing market price, at varying prices
determined at the time of sale, or at negotiated prices.
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol OCLS. On August 29, 2007, the last
reported sale price for our common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Market was $6.96 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Before buying any shares, you should carefully consider the risk
factors described in Risk Factors beginning on
page 6 of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
We use several trademarks in our business, including Microcyn,
Dermacyn and Vetericyn. We own trademark registrations for these
and other marks in the United States and in other countries, and
we are currently seeking to register our Cidalcyn, Dentricyn and
other marks in the United States and in other countries. All
other trademarks, trade names or services marks appearing in
this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
Our human wound product is marketed under the name Dermacyn in
the United States, the European Union and Canada, under the name
Microcyn60 in Mexico and under the name Oxum in India. We have
agreed to cease marketing our product in Mexico under the name
Microcyn60 by September 2007 as a result of the settlement of a
trademark confusion claim in Mexico. All references in this
prospectus to Microcyn as a product are to the products marketed
under their respective names. Other references to Microcyn are
to our platform technology used in producing our products for
wound care and for other markets.
You should rely only on the information provided or incorporated
by reference in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone
to provide you with additional or different information. This
prospectus may only be used where it is legal to sell these
securities. You should not assume that any information in this
prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of
this prospectus. Information incorporated by reference in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of the document
incorporated by reference.
You should read carefully the entire prospectus, as well as the
documents incorporated by reference into the prospectus, before
making an investment decision. In this prospectus, unless
otherwise indicated, the words we, us,
and our refer to Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.
and its subsidiaries and do not refer to the selling
stockholders.
The following summary highlights selected information from
this prospectus and the information incorporated by reference.
Because this is a summary, it does not contain all the
information about us that may be important to you. You should
read carefully the more detailed information in this prospectus,
including Risk Factors, and other documents which
are incorporated by reference in this prospectus.
Our
Business
We have developed, and we manufacture and market, a family of
products intended to prevent and treat infections in chronic and
acute wounds. Infection is a serious potential complication in
both chronic and acute wounds, and controlling infection is a
critical step in wound healing. Our platform technology, called
Microcyn, is a proprietary oxychlorine small molecule
formulation that is designed to treat a wide range of organisms
that cause disease, or pathogens, including viruses, fungi,
spores and antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria, such as
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, and
Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, or VRE, in wounds. We
do not have the necessary regulatory approvals to market
Microcyn in the United States as a drug, nor do we have the
necessary regulatory clearance or approval to market Microcyn in
the U.S. as a medical device for an antimicrobial or wound
healing indication. However, our device product is cleared for
sale in the United States as a medical device for wound
cleaning, or debridement, lubricating, moistening and dressing;
is a device under CE Mark, or European Union certification, for
wound cleaning and the reduction of infection in Europe; and is
approved as a drug in India and Mexico.
Clinical testing we conducted in connection with our submissions
to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, as well
as physician clinical studies, suggest that our Microcyn-based
product may help reduce a wide range of pathogens in acute and
chronic wounds. These physician clinical studies suggest that
our Microcyn-based product is easy to use and complementary to
most existing treatment methods in wound care. Physician
clinical studies in the United States suggest that our 510(k)
product may shorten hospital stays, lower aggregate patient care
costs and, in certain cases, reduce the need for system-wide, or
systemic, antibiotics. A 510(k) is a premarket submission made
to the FDA to demonstrate that a device to be marketed is at
least as safe and effective as a legally marketed device.
In 2005, chronic and acute wound care represented an aggregate
of $9.6 billion in global product sales, of which
$3.3 billion was spent for the treatment of skin ulcers,
$1.6 billion to treat burns and $4.7 billion for the
treatment of surgical and trauma wounds, according to Kalorama
Information, a life sciences market research firm. We believe
our addressable market for the treatment of skin ulcers is
$1.3 billion, for the treatment of burns, $300 million
and for the treatment of surgical and trauma wounds,
$700 million. Common methods of controlling infection,
including topical antiseptics and antibiotics, have proven to be
only moderately effective in combating infection in the wound
bed. However, topical antiseptics tend to inhibit the healing
process due to their toxicity and may require specialized
preparation or handling. Antibiotics can lead to the emergence
of resistant bacteria, such as MRSA and VRE. Systemic
antibiotics may not be effective in controlling infection in
patients with disorders affecting circulation, such as diabetes,
which are commonly associated with chronic wounds. As a result,
no single treatment is used across all types of wounds and
stages of healing.
We believe Microcyn provides significant advantages over current
methods of care in the treatment of a wide range of chronic and
acute wounds throughout all stages of treatment. These stages
include cleaning, or debridement, prevention and treatment of
infections and wound healing. We believe that Microcyn may be
the first topical product that is effective against a broad
range of bacteria and other infectious microbes including
antibiotic resistant strains such as MRSA and VRE, without
causing irritation of or damage to healthy tissue. Unlike most
antibiotics, we believe Microcyn does not target specific
strains of bacteria, a practice that has been shown to promote
the development of resistant bacteria. In addition, our products
are shelf stable, require no special preparation, and are easy
to use.
Our goal is to become a worldwide leader using anti-infectives
in treating wounds. In addition to the regulatory clearances and
approvals that we have already obtained, we intend to seek
additional regulatory clearances and approvals to market our
Microcyn-based products worldwide. In July 2004, we began
selling Microcyn in Mexico after receiving approval from the
Mexican Ministry of Health, or MOH, for the use of Microcyn as
an antiseptic,
1
disinfectant and sterilant. Since then, physicians in the United
States, Europe, India and Mexico have conducted 21 physician
clinical studies assessing Microcyns use in the treatment
of infections in a variety of wound types, including
hard-to-treat wounds such as diabetic ulcers and burns. These
studies were not intended to be rigorously designed or
controlled clinical trials and, as such, did not have all of the
controls required for clinical trials used to support a new drug
application, or NDA, submission to the FDA, which requires
certain trial parameters such as blinding, randomization,
predefined clinical end points, use of placebo and active
control groups or U.S. good clinical practices
requirements. We used the data generated from some of these
studies to support our application for the CE Mark for wound
cleaning and reduction of infection. We received the CE Mark in
November 2004 and additional international approvals in Canada,
Mexico and India. Microcyn has also received three FDA 510(k)
clearances for use as a medical device in wound cleaning, or
debridement, lubricating, moistening and dressing, including
traumatic wounds and acute and chronic dermal lesions.
In the second quarter of 2007, we initiated a Phase II
randomized clinical trial, which is designed to evaluate the
effectiveness of Microcyn in mildly infected diabetic foot
ulcers with endpoints of resolution of all symptoms of
inflammation, or clinical cure, and improvement in signs and
symptoms of infection supported by microbiological response as
described in FDA guidelines. We are using more than 10 clinical
sites with a target of enrolling 60 patients in three test
groups using Microcyn alone, Microcyn plus an oral antibiotic or
saline plus an oral antibiotic. We expect to announce the
results of our Phase II trial in autumn of 2007. A contract
research organization is coordinating, monitoring and
documenting results of this trial. Following the completion of
this trial, and a review meeting with the FDA, and assuming
successful completion of the Phase II trial, we intend to
initiate two Phase III trials. We anticipate that patient
enrollment for Phase III trials will start in early 2008,
and the trials will last about 12 to 18 months. These
Phase II and Phase III clinical trials are intended to
provide the clinical basis for submission to the FDA of an NDA
for the treatment of infected diabetic foot ulcers. In the event
that we obtain drug approval from the FDA, we may seek clearance
for treatment of other types of wounds. We intend to continue to
pursue strategic partnerships to assess potential applications
for Microcyn in several other markets, including respiratory,
ophthalmology, dermatology, dental and veterinary markets, and
FDA or other governmental approvals may be required for any
potential new products or new indications. We have reduced
expenses in our international operations in order to focus our
resources on our U.S. clinical trials.
We currently make Microcyn available under our 510(k) clearances
in the United States primarily through our website, one national
distributor and several regional distributors. We plan for a
more aggressive commercialization and product launch in the
event we obtain drug approval from the FDA. Most of our current
marketing efforts in the United States are designed to build
brand awareness. In Europe, we sell Microcyn through exclusive
distribution agreements with distributors, all of which, we
believe, are experienced suppliers to hospitals, supported by a
distributor coordinator. We are seeking a significant
distribution partner to sell the product in Europe into the
wound care market. Also, we have a distribution agreement with a
private company in Europe that distributes Microcyn in Europe to
salons for cleaning hands and feet during cosmetic treatments.
In Mexico, we sell Microcyn through a network of distributors
and through a contract sales force, including salespeople,
nurses and clinical support staff. In India we sell through
Alkem, a large pharmaceutical company in India. Our fiscal
2007 year marked the first full year of the product launch
of Microcyn in India. In China, we recently signed a
distribution agreement with China Bao Tai, which intends to
distribute Microcyn to hospitals, doctors and clinics through
Sinopharm, the largest pharmaceutical company in China, and to
retail pharmacies through Lianhua Supermarkets after required
regulatory approval in China is obtained.
We also operate a microbiology contract testing laboratory
division that provides consulting and laboratory services to
medical companies that design and manufacture biomedical devices
and drugs, as well as testing on our products and potential
products. Our testing laboratory is required to comply with
U.S. good manufacturing practices and quality systems
regulation. We are in the process of transitioning our business
away from providing laboratory services to others, as we
continue to focus our efforts on completion of our clinical
trials.
2
Market
Opportunity
Commonly used topical antiseptics and antibiotics have
limitations and side effects that may constrain their usage. For
example:
|
|
|
| |
|
many antiseptics, including Betadine, hydrogen peroxide and
Dakins solution, are toxic, can destroy human cells and
tissue, may cause allergic reactions and can impede the wound
healing process;
|
| |
| |
|
silver-based products are expensive and require precise dosage
and close monitoring by trained medical staff to minimize the
potential for tissue toxicity allergic reactions and bacterial
resistance;
|
| |
| |
|
the increase in antibiotic resistant bacterial strains, such as
MRSA and VRE, have compromised the effectiveness of some widely
used topical antibiotics including Neosporin and
Bacitracin; and
|
| |
| |
|
oral and systemic antibiotics often are not effective in
treating topical infections and can cause serious side effects.
|
Our
Solution
We believe Microcyn has potential advantages over current
methods of care in the treatment of chronic and acute wounds,
including the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Wound Care Solution. Our 510(k) product is
cleared as a medical device for sale in the United States in
wound cleaning, or debridement, lubricating, moistening and
dressing. Although we do not have the necessary regulatory
approvals to market Microcyn in the United States as a drug,
laboratory testing and physician clinical studies further
suggest that our 510(k) Microcyn product may be effective
against a wide range of bacteria that causes infection in a
variety of acute and chronic wounds. In addition, because of its
mechanism of action, we believe Microcyn does not target
specific strains of bacteria, a practice that has been shown to
promote the development of resistant bacteria. In physician
clinical studies, our 510(k) Microcyn product has been used in
conjunction with other wound care therapeutic products. Data
from these studies suggest that patients generally experienced
less pain, improved mobility and physical activity levels and
better quality of life.
|
| |
| |
|
Non-irritating. Our 510(k) product label
states that our 510(k) product, which is based on our Microcyn
technology, is non-irritating and non-sensitizing to the skin
and eyes. Throughout all our clinical trials and physician
clinical studies to date and since our first commercial sale of
Microcyn in Mexico in 2004, we have received no reports of
serious adverse events related to the use of Microcyn products.
|
| |
| |
|
Ease of Use. Our 510(k) product label states
that our 510(k) product requires no special handling
precautions. Our products require no preparation before use or
at time of disposal, and caregivers can use our products without
significant training. In addition, Microcyn can be stored at
room temperature. Unlike other super-oxidized water solutions,
which are typically stable for not more than 48 hours, our
laboratory tests show that Microcyn has a shelf life ranging
from one to two years depending on the size and type of
packaging. Our products are also designed to be complementary to
most advanced technologies to treat serious wounds, such as
negative pressure wound therapy, jet lavage and
tissue-engineered skin substitutes.
|
| |
| |
|
Cost-Effectiveness. The treatment of many
wounds requires extended hospitalization and care, including the
use of expensive systemic antibiotics. Infection prolongs the
healing time and necessitates increased use of systemic
antibiotics. We believe that Microcyn has the potential to help
treat infection, accelerate healing time and, in certain cases,
may help reduce the need for systemic antibiotics, reduce the
need for amputation and lead to earlier hospital discharge,
thereby lowering overall patient cost.
|
3
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to become a worldwide leader using anti-infectives
in treating wounds. We also intend to leverage our expertise in
wound care into additional market opportunities. The key
elements of our strategy include the following:
Obtain
drug regulatory approvals in the United States
We intend to seek additional regulatory clearances and
approvals, which we believe will allow us to accelerate adoption
of our products by wound care specialists worldwide. We have
initiated a Phase II trial, which is designed to evaluate
the effectiveness of Microcyn in mildly infected diabetic foot
ulcers with endpoints of clinical cure and improvement in signs
and symptoms of infection supported by microbiological response.
We expect to announce the results of our Phase II trial in
autumn of 2007. Following the completion of this trial and a
review meeting with the FDA, and assuming successful completion
of this trial, we intend to initiate two Phase III trials,
enrolling patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers. We
anticipate that Phase III trials will start in early 2008
and will last about 12 to 18 months. Results from these
Phase II and Phase III clinical trials are intended to
provide the clinical basis for submission to the FDA of an NDA
for the treatment of infected diabetic foot ulcers.
Drive
adoption of Microcyn as the standard of care in the wound care
market to help prevent and treat infection
We believe our products are well positioned to become the
standard of care in helping to treat infections, subject to
obtaining the required approvals. We seek to drive adoption of
Microcyn as the standard of care in the wound care market by
establishing strong scientific, evidence-based rationale for its
use. We intend to continue to maintain a marketing presence in
key medical communities throughout the world through targeted
direct marketing, publication in scientific journals, and
sponsorships of physician presentations at medical conferences
and seminars.
Develop
strategic collaborations and distribution in the acute and
chronic wound care market
Outside the United States and Mexico, we are actively pursuing
strategic relationships with respect to sales, marketing and
distribution. To accelerate adoption of our products, we may
enter into strategic relationships with healthcare companies
that have product lines, a sales force and distribution channels
that are complementary to ours. We believe collaborations allow
us to leverage our resources and technology. We intend to pursue
access to these markets through strategic partnerships. These
relationships may take the form of co-development, co-promotion,
co-marketing or distribution agreements.
We currently make Microcyn available under our 510(k) clearances
in the United States primarily through our website, one national
distributor and several regional distributors. We plan for a
more aggressive commercialization and product launch in the
event we obtain drug approval from the FDA. After filing the NDA
with the FDA, we may hire a direct sales force or form a
strategic collaboration with a company that already has an
existing sales force to address the US market.
Develop
strategic partnerships in numerous indications outside the wound
care market
We believe our products have potential applications in several
other large markets, including respiratory, ophthalmology,
dermatology, dental and veterinary markets. We intend to pursue
access to these markets through strategic partnerships.
4
Corporate
Information
We were incorporated in California in 1999 as Micromed
Laboratories, Inc. In August 2001, we changed our name to Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc. In December 2006, we reincorporated in
Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at
1129 N. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, California, 94954,
and our telephone number is
(707) 782-0792.
We have two principal subsidiaries: Oculus Technologies of
Mexico, S.A. de C.V., organized in Mexico, and Oculus Innovative
Sciences Netherlands, B.V., organized in The Netherlands. We
also have a subsidiary, Oculus Innovative Sciences Japan, KK.,
organized under Japanese law. Our website is www.oculusis.com.
Information on our website is not a part of this prospectus.
The
Offering
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the
selling stockholders
|
|
|
3,249,860 shares
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from this offering. We
will, however, receive the proceeds from the sale of shares of
our common stock to the selling stockholders upon the cash
exercise of their warrants. We will bear costs relating to the
registration of the shares. See Plan of Distribution
for more information.
5
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the following information
about these risks, as well as the other information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus, before you decide
to buy any shares of our common stock. Risks and uncertainties,
in addition to those we describe below, that are not presently
known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also
impair our business operations. If any of the following risks
materialize, our business could be harmed, the price of our
common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We
have a history of losses, we expect to continue to incur losses
and we may never achieve profitability.
We have incurred significant net losses in each fiscal year
since our inception, including losses of $19.8 million,
$23.1 million and $16.5 million for the years ended
March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and
$5.0 million during the three months ended June 30,
2007. Our accumulated deficit as of June 30, 2007 was
$75.5 million. We have yet to demonstrate that we can
generate sufficient sales of our products to become profitable.
The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of
profitability are highly uncertain, and we may never achieve
profitability. Even if we do generate significant revenues from
our product sales, we expect that increased operating expenses
will result in significant operating losses in the near term as
we, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
|
conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials on our products
and product candidates;
|
| |
| |
|
seek FDA clearance to market Microcyn as a drug in the United
States;
|
| |
| |
|
increase our research and development efforts to enhance our
existing products, commercialize new products and develop new
product candidates;
|
| |
| |
|
establish additional and expand existing manufacturing
facilities; and
|
| |
| |
|
grow our sales and marketing capabilities in the United States
and internationally.
|
As a result of these activities, we will need to generate
significant revenue in order to achieve profitability and may
never become profitable. We must also maintain specified cash
reserves in connection with our loan and security agreement
which may limit our investment opportunities. Failure to
maintain these reserves would trigger the requirement for us to
prepay outstanding principal in the amount necessary to restore
compliance with certain financial ratios in the agreement with
our secured lender. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may
not be able to sustain or increase profitability on an ongoing
basis.
If we do not raise additional capital, we will need to curtail
some operational activities in order to reduce costs. We cannot
provide any assurance that we will secure any commitments for
new financing on acceptable terms, if at all.
Because
all of our products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology, we will need to generate sufficient revenues from
the sale of Microcyn to execute our business plan.
All of our products are based on our Microcyn platform
technology, and we do not have any non-Microcyn product
candidates that will generate revenues in the foreseeable
future. Accordingly, we expect to derive substantially all of
our future revenues from sales of our current Microcyn products.
We have only been selling our products since July 2004, and
substantially all of our historical product revenues have been
from sales of Microcyn in Mexico. Although we began selling in
Europe in October 2004, in the United States in June 2005, and
in India in July 2006, our product revenues outside of Mexico
were not significant prior to fiscal year 2007. For example,
product revenues from countries outside of Mexico were just 9%
of our product revenues for the year ended March 31, 2006.
However, during the year ended March 31, 2007, the
percentage of product revenues from outside of Mexico increased
to 32% and during the three months ended June 30, 2007
decreased to 17%. Microcyn has not been adopted as a standard of
care for wound treatment in any country and may not gain
acceptance among physicians, nurses, patients, third-party
payors and the medical community. Existing protocols for wound
care are well established within the medical community and tend
to vary geographically, and healthcare providers may be
6
reluctant to alter their protocols to include the use of
Microcyn. If Microcyn does not achieve an adequate level of
acceptance, we will not generate sufficient revenues to become
profitable. We recently decreased our sales and marketing
activities in Europe and Mexico, which could materially affect
our revenues in the geographic areas in the future.
Our
inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms in the
future may cause us to curtail certain operational activities,
including regulatory trials, sales and marketing, and
international operations, in order to reduce costs and sustain
the business, and would have a material adverse effect on our
business and financial condition.
We expect capital outlays and operating expenditures to increase
over the next several years as we work to conduct regulatory
trials, commercialize our products and expand our
infrastructure. We have entered into debt financing arrangements
which are secured by all of our assets. We may need to raise
additional capital to, among other things:
|
|
|
| |
|
fund our clinical trials and preclinical studies;
|
| |
| |
|
seek FDA clearance to market Microcyn as a drug in the United
States;
|
| |
| |
|
sustain commercialization of our current products or new
products;
|
| |
| |
|
fund our research and development activities;
|
| |
| |
|
expand our manufacturing capabilities;
|
| |
| |
|
increase our sales and marketing efforts to drive market
adoption and address competitive developments;
|
| |
| |
|
acquire or license technologies; and
|
| |
| |
|
finance capital expenditures and our general and administrative
expenses.
|
Our present and future funding requirements will depend on many
factors, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
the progress and timing of our clinical trials;
|
| |
| |
|
the level of research and development investment required to
maintain and improve our technology position;
|
| |
| |
|
cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent
claims and other intellectual property rights;
|
| |
| |
|
our efforts to acquire or license complementary technologies or
acquire complementary businesses;
|
| |
| |
|
changes in product development plans needed to address any
difficulties in commercialization;
|
| |
| |
|
competing technological and market developments; and
|
| |
| |
|
changes in regulatory policies or laws that affect our
operations.
|
If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible
debt securities, dilution to our stockholders could result. Any
equity or convertible debt securities issued also may provide
for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders
of our common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing
debt securities, these debt securities would have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our
common stock, and the terms of the debt securities issued could
impose significant restrictions on our operations. If we raise
additional funds through collaborations and licensing
arrangements, we might be required to relinquish significant
rights to our technologies or products, or grant licenses on
terms that are not favorable to us. A failure to obtain adequate
funds may cause us to curtail certain operational activities,
including regulatory trials, sales and marketing, and
international operations, in order to reduce costs and sustain
the business, and would have a material adverse effect on our
business and financial condition.
7
We do
not have the necessary regulatory approvals to market Microcyn
as a drug in the United States.
We have obtained three 510(k) clearances in the United States
that permit us to sell Microcyn as a medical device to clean,
moisten and debride wounds. However, we do not have the
necessary regulatory approvals to market Microcyn in the United
States as a drug, which we will need to obtain in order to
execute our business plan. Before we are permitted to sell
Microcyn as a drug in the United States, we must, among other
things, successfully complete additional preclinical studies and
well-controlled clinical trials, submit a New Drug Application,
or NDA, to the FDA and obtain FDA approval. In July 2006, we
completed a controlled clinical trial for pre-operative skin
preparation. After completion of this trial, the FDA advised us
that it is considering adopting new heightened performance
requirements for evaluating efficacy of products designed to be
used in pre-operative skin preparation such as ours. In
discussions with the FDA, the FDA has not provided us with the
definitive timing for, or parameters of, any such requirements,
and has informally stated that it is uncertain during what time
frame it will be able to do so. We may in the future continue
our discussions with the FDA regarding the possible timing and
parameters of any new guidelines for evaluating efficacy for
pre-operative skin preparations. Depending on the ultimate
position of the FDA regarding performance criteria for
pre-operative skin preparations, we may reassess our priorities,
clinical timelines and schedules for pursuing a pre-operative
skin preparation indication or may decide not to pursue this
indication. We also intend to seek FDA approval for the use of
Microcyn to treat infections in wounds.
We have sponsored the majority of physicians performing
physician clinical studies of Microcyn and in some cases, the
physicians who performed these studies also hold equity in our
company. The physician clinical studies were performed in the
United States, Mexico and Italy, and used various endpoints,
methods and controls. These studies were not intended to be
rigorously designed or controlled clinical trials and, as such,
did not have all of the controls required for clinical trials
used to support an NDA submission to the FDA in that they did
not include blinding, randomization, predefined clinical
endpoints, use of placebo and active control groups or
U.S. good clinical practice requirements. Consequently, the
results of these physician clinical studies may not be used by
us to support an NDA submission for Microcyn to the FDA. In
addition, any results obtained from clinical trials designed to
support an NDA submission for Microcyn to the FDA may not be as
favorable as results from such physician clinical studies and
otherwise may not be sufficient to support an NDA submission or
FDA approval of any Microcyn NDA.
The FDA approval process is expensive and uncertain, requires
detailed and comprehensive scientific and other data and
generally takes several years. Despite the time and expense
exerted, approval is never guaranteed. We do not know whether we
will obtain favorable results in our preclinical and clinical
studies or whether we will obtain the necessary regulatory
approvals to market Microcyn as a drug in the United States. We
anticipate that obtaining approval for the use of Microcyn to
treat infections in wounds in the United States will take
several years. Even if we obtain FDA approval to sell Microcyn
as a drug, we may not be able to successfully commercialize
Microcyn as a drug in the United States and may never recover
the substantial costs we have invested in the development of our
Microcyn products.
Delays
or adverse results in clinical trials could result in increased
costs to us and delay our ability to generate
revenue.
Clinical trials can be long and expensive, and the outcome of
clinical trials is uncertain and subject to delays. It may take
several years to complete clinical trials, if at all, and a
product candidate may fail at any stage of the clinical trial
process. The length of time required varies substantially
according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of
the product candidate. Interim results of a preclinical study or
clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results, and
acceptable results in preclinical studies or early clinical
trials may not be repeatable in later subsequent clinical
trials. The commencement or completion of any of our clinical
trials may be delayed or halted for a variety of reasons,
including the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
FDA requirements for approval, including requirements for
testing efficacy or safety, may change;
|
| |
| |
|
the FDA or other regulatory authorities do not approve a
clinical trial protocol;
|
| |
| |
|
patients do not enroll in clinical trials at the rate we expect;
|
| |
| |
|
delays in reaching agreement on acceptable clinical trial
agreement terms with prospective sites;
|
8
|
|
|
| |
|
delays in obtaining institutional review board approval to
conduct a study at a prospective site;
|
| |
| |
|
safety concerns;
|
| |
| |
|
third party clinical investigators do not perform our clinical
trials on our anticipated schedule or consistent with the
clinical trial protocol and good clinical practices, or the
third party organizations do not perform data collection and
analysis in a timely or accurate manner;
|
| |
| |
|
governmental regulations or administrative actions are
changed; and
|
| |
| |
|
insufficient funds to continue our clinical trials.
|
We do not know whether our existing or any future clinical
trials will demonstrate safety and efficacy sufficiently to
result in additional FDA approvals. While a number of physicians
have conducted clinical studies assessing the safety and
efficacy of Microcyn for various indications, the data from
these studies is not sufficient to support approval of Microcyn
as a drug in the United States. In addition, further studies and
trials could show different results. For example, after EPA
review of our registration filing, including the results of
disinfectant efficacy testing conducted by an independent
laboratory retained by us, we obtained EPA authorization, or
registration, for the distribution and sale of our
Microcyn-based product, Cidalcyn, as a hospital grade
disinfectant. The EPA conducted subsequent tests and informed us
that Cidalcyn did not meet efficacy standards when tested
against three specific pathogens. In response to this test, we
voluntarily recalled samples of the product previously
distributed and later entered into a Consent Agreement and Final
Order with the EPA, allowing us to amend our EPA registration
and pay a $20,800 fine without admitting or denying any
wrongdoing. In addition, in an independent physician study of
10 patients in which procedures were not fully delineated,
published in February 2007, four patients discontinued treatment
with Microcyn due to pain, and beneficial change in wound
microbiology was found in only one of the six remaining
patients. We will be required to conduct additional clinical
trials prior to seeking approval of Microcyn for additional
indications. Our failure to adequately demonstrate the safety
and efficacy of our product candidates to the satisfaction of
the FDA will prevent our receipt of FDA approval for additional
indications and, ultimately, impact commercialization of our
products in the United States. If we experience significant
delays or adverse results in clinical trials, our financial
results and the commercial prospects for products based on
Microcyn will be harmed, our costs would increase and our
ability to generate revenue would be delayed.
If we
fail to obtain, or experience significant delays in obtaining
additional regulatory clearances or approvals to market our
current or future products, we may be unable to commercialize
these products.
Developing, testing, manufacturing, marketing and selling of
medical technology products are subject to extensive regulation
by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and
other countries. The process of obtaining regulatory clearance
and approval of medical technology products is costly and time
consuming. Even though the underlying product formulation may be
the same or similar, our products are subject to different
regulations and approval processes depending upon their intended
use. In the United States, use of Microcyn to cleanse and
debride a wound comes within the medical device regulation
framework, while use of Microcyn to treat infections in wounds
will require us to seek FDA approval of Microcyn as a drug in
the United States.
To obtain regulatory approval of our products as drugs in the
United States, we must first show that our products are safe and
effective for target indications through preclinical studies
(laboratory and animal testing) and clinical trials (human
testing). The FDA generally clears marketing of a medical device
through the 510(k) pre-market clearance process if it is
demonstrated that the new product has the same intended use and
the same or similar technological characteristics as another
legally marketed Class II device, such as a device already
cleared by the FDA through the 510(k) premarket notification
process, and otherwise meets the FDAs requirements.
Product modifications, including labeling the product for a new
intended use, may require the submission of a new 510(k)
clearance and FDA approval before the modified product can be
marketed.
We do not know whether our products based on Microcyn will
receive approval from the FDA as a drug. The data from clinical
studies of Microcyn conducted by physicians to date will not
satisfy the FDAs regulatory criteria for approval of an
NDA. In order for us to seek approval for the use of Microcyn as
a drug in the treatment of infections in wounds, we will be
required to conduct additional preclinical and clinical trials
and submit
9
applications for approval to the FDA. For example, we recently
initiated a Phase II study of Microcyn for the treatment of
wound infections, and we will need to conduct additional
non-clinical and well-controlled clinical trials in order to
generate data to support FDA approval of Microcyn for this
indication.
The outcomes of clinical trials are inherently uncertain. In
addition, we do not know whether the necessary approvals or
clearances will be granted or delayed for future products. The
FDA could request additional information or clinical testing
that could adversely affect the time to market and sale of
products as drugs. If we do not obtain the requisite regulatory
clearances and approvals, we will be unable to commercialize our
products as drugs or devices and may never recover any of the
substantial costs we have invested in the development of
Microcyn.
Distribution of our products outside the United States is
subject to extensive government regulation. These regulations,
including the requirements for approvals or clearance to market,
the time required for regulatory review and the sanctions
imposed for violations, vary from country to country. We do not
know whether we will obtain regulatory approvals in such
countries or that we will not be required to incur significant
costs in obtaining or maintaining these regulatory approvals. In
addition, the export by us of certain of our products that have
not yet been cleared for domestic commercial distribution may be
subject to FDA export restrictions. Failure to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals, the restriction, suspension or revocation
of existing approvals or any other failure to comply with
regulatory requirements would have a material adverse effect on
our future business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
If our
products do not gain market acceptance, our business will suffer
because we might not be able to fund future
operations.
A number of factors may affect the market acceptance of our
products or any other products we develop or acquire, including,
among others:
|
|
|
| |
|
the price of our products relative to other treatments for the
same or similar treatments;
|
| |
| |
|
the perception by patients, physicians and other members of the
health care community of the effectiveness and safety of our
products for their indicated applications and treatments;
|
| |
| |
|
our ability to fund our sales and marketing efforts; and
|
| |
| |
|
the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.
|
If our products do not gain market acceptance, we may not be
able to fund future operations, including developing, testing
and obtaining regulatory approval for new product candidates and
expanding our sales and marketing efforts for our approved
products, which would cause our business to suffer.
We
have agreed to change the brand name of our product in Mexico,
which may result in the loss of any brand recognition that we
have established with users of our products.
In accordance with the settlement of a trademark infringement
lawsuit filed against us in Mexico, we have agreed to stop using
the name Microcyn60 in Mexico by September 2007. In addition, in
May 2006, a complaint was filed against us for trademark
confusion in connection with the same tradename, and we are in
settlement negotiations concerning such claim. We have marketed
our products in Mexico under the brand name of Microcyn60 since
2004. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and the
year ended March 31, 2007, the percentage of our product
revenues derived from Mexico were 83% and 68%, respectively. As
a result of our agreement to change our product name, we may
lose the benefit of the brand name recognition we have generated
in the region and our product sales in Mexico could decline. In
locations where we have distributed our products, we believe
that the brand names of those products have developed name
recognition among consumers who purchase them. Any change to the
brand name of our other products may cause us to lose such name
recognition, which may lead to confusion in the marketplace and
a decline in sales of our products.
10
If our
competitors develop products similar to Microcyn, we may need to
modify or alter our business strategy, which may delay the
achievement of our goals.
Competitors may develop products with similar characteristics as
Microcyn. Such similar products marketed by larger competitors
can hinder our efforts to penetrate the market. As a result, we
may be forced to modify or alter our business and regulatory
strategy and sales and marketing plans, as a response to changes
in the market, competition and technology limitations, among
others. Such modifications may pose additional delays in
achieving our goals.
We
intend to license or collaborate with third parties in various
potential markets, and events involving these strategic partners
or any future collaborations could delay or prevent us from
developing or commercializing products.
Our business strategy and our short- and long-term operating
results will depend in part on our ability to execute on
existing strategic collaborations and to license or partner with
new strategic partners. We believe collaborations allow us to
leverage our resources and technologies and to access markets
that are compatible with our own core areas of expertise while
avoiding the cost of establishing a direct sales force in each
market. We may incur significant costs in the use of third
parties to identify and assist in establishing relationships
with potential collaborators.
To penetrate our target markets, we may need to enter into
additional collaborative agreements to assist in the development
and commercialization of future products. For example, depending
upon our analysis of the time and expense involved in obtaining
FDA approval to sell a product to treat open wounds, we may
choose to license our technology to a third party as opposed to
pursuing commercialization ourselves. Establishing strategic
collaborations is difficult and time-consuming. Potential
collaborators may reject collaborations based upon their
assessment of our financial, regulatory or intellectual property
position and our internal capabilities. Our discussions with
potential collaborators may not lead to the establishment of new
collaborations on favorable terms. We have limited control over
the amount and timing of resources that our current
collaborators or any future collaborators devote to our
collaborations or potential products. These collaborators may
breach or terminate their agreements with us or otherwise fail
to conduct their collaborative activities successfully and in a
timely manner. Further, our collaborators may not develop or
commercialize products that arise out of our collaborative
arrangements or devote sufficient resources to the development,
manufacture, marketing or sale of these products. By entering
into a collaboration, we may preclude opportunities to
collaborate with other third parties who do not wish to
associate with our existing third party strategic partners.
Moreover, in the event of termination of a collaboration
agreement, termination negotiations may result in less favorable
terms.
If we
are unable to expand our direct domestic sales force, we may not
be able to successfully sell our products in the United
States.
We have very limited commercialization capability and make
Microcyn-based products available primarily through our website,
one national distributor and several regional distributors. We
plan for a more aggressive commercialization and product launch
in the event we obtain drug approval from the FDA. Developing a
sales force is expensive and time consuming, and the lack of
qualified sales personnel could delay or limit the success of
our product launch. Our domestic sales force, if established,
will be competing with the sales operations of our competitors,
which are better funded and more experienced. We may not be able
to develop domestic sales capacity on a timely basis or at all.
Our
dependence on distributors for sales could limit or prevent us
from selling our products and from realizing long-term revenue
growth.
We currently depend on distributors to sell Microcyn in the
United States, Europe and other countries and intend to continue
to sell our products primarily through distributors in Europe
and the United States for the foreseeable future. If we are
unable to expand our direct sales force, we will continue to
rely on distributors to sell Microcyn. Our existing distribution
agreements are generally short-term in duration, and we may need
to pursue alternate distributors if the other parties to these
agreements terminate or elect not to renew their agreements. If
we
11
are unable to retain our current distributors for any reason, we
must replace them with alternate distributors experienced in
supplying the wound care market, which could be time-consuming
and divert managements attention from other operational
matters. In addition, we will need to attract additional
distributors to expand the geographic areas in which we sell
Microcyn. Distributors may not commit the necessary resources to
market and sell our products to the level of our expectations,
which could harm our ability to generate revenues. In addition,
some of our distributors may also sell products that compete
with ours. In some countries, regulatory licenses must be held
by residents of the country. For example, the regulatory
approval for one product in India is owned and held by our
Indian distributor. If the licenses are not in our name or under
our control, we might not have the power to ensure their ongoing
effectiveness and use by us. If current or future distributors
do not perform adequately, or we are unable to locate
distributors in particular geographic areas, we may not realize
long-term revenue growth.
We
depend on a contract sales force to sell our products in
Mexico.
We currently depend on a contract sales force to sell Microcyn
in Mexico. Our existing agreement is short-term in duration and
can be terminated by either party upon 30 days written
notice. If we are unable to retain our current agreement for any
reason, we may need to build our own internal sales force or
find an alternate source for contract sales people. We may be
unable to find an alternate source, or the alternate
sources sales force may not generate sufficient revenue.
If our current or future contract sales force does not perform
adequately, we may not realize long-term revenue growth in
Mexico.
If we
fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we
experience unanticipated problems with our products, these
products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the
market.
Regulatory approvals or clearances that we currently have and
that we may receive in the future are subject to limitations on
the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed, and
any future approvals could contain requirements for potentially
costly post-marketing
follow-up
studies. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials or
activities constitute promotion of an unapproved use or we
otherwise fail to comply with FDA regulations, we may be subject
to regulatory enforcement actions, including a warning letter,
injunction, seizure, civil fine or criminal penalties. In
addition, the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, adverse event
reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, distribution and
record-keeping for approved products are subject to extensive
regulation. Our manufacturing facilities, processes and
specifications are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA,
European and other regulatory authorities and from time to time,
we may receive notices of deficiencies from these agencies as a
result of such inspections. Our failure to continue to meet
regulatory standards or to remedy any deficiencies could result
in restrictions being imposed on products or manufacturing
processes, fines, suspension or loss of regulatory approvals or
clearances, product recalls, termination of distribution or
product seizures or the need to invest substantial resources to
comply with various existing and new requirements. In the more
egregious cases, criminal sanctions, civil penalties,
disgorgement of profits or closure of our manufacturing
facilities are possible. The subsequent discovery of previously
unknown problems with Microcyn, including adverse events of
unanticipated severity or frequency, may result in restrictions
on the marketing of our products, and could include voluntary or
mandatory recall or withdrawal of products from the market.
New government regulations may be enacted and changes in FDA
policies and regulations, their interpretation and enforcement,
could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse
government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.
Therefore, we do not know whether we will be able to continue to
comply with any regulations or that the costs of such compliance
will not have a material adverse effect on our future business,
financial condition, and results of operations. If we are not
able to maintain regulatory compliance, we will not be permitted
to market our products and our business would suffer.
We may
experience difficulties in manufacturing Microcyn, which could
prevent us from commercializing one or more of our
products.
The machines used to manufacture our Microcyn-based products are
complex, use complicated software and must be monitored by
highly trained engineers. Slight deviations anywhere in our
manufacturing process, including quality control, labeling and
packaging, could lead to a failure to meet the specifications
required by the FDA, the
12
EPA, European notified bodies, Mexican regulatory agencies and
other foreign regulatory bodies, which may result in lot
failures or product recalls. In August 2006, we received a
show cause letter from the EPA, which stated that,
in tests conducted by the EPA, Cidalcyn was found to be
ineffective in killing specified pathogens when used according
to label directions. We gathered records for review to determine
if there might have been any problems in production of the lot
tested by the EPA. We have also quarantined all remaining
quantities of the production lot in question. If we are unable
to obtain quality internal and external components, mechanical
and electrical parts, if our software contains defects or is
corrupted, or if we are unable to attract and retain qualified
technicians to manufacture our products, our manufacturing
output of Microcyn, or any other product candidate based on our
platform that we may develop, could fail to meet required
standards, our regulatory approvals could be delayed, denied or
revoked, and commercialization of one or more of our
Microcyn-based products may be delayed or foregone.
Manufacturing processes that are used to produce the smaller
quantities of Microcyn needed for our clinical test and current
commercial sales may not be successfully scaled up to allow
production of significant commercial quantities. Any failure to
manufacture our products to required standards on a commercial
scale could result in reduced revenues, delays in generating
revenue and increased costs.
Our
competitive position depends on our ability to protect our
intellectual property and our proprietary
technologies.
Our ability to compete and to achieve and maintain profitability
depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property and
proprietary technologies. We currently rely on a combination of
patents, patent applications, trademarks, trade secret laws,
confidentiality agreements, license agreements and invention
assignment agreements to protect our intellectual property
rights. We also rely upon unpatented know-how and continuing
technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive
position. These measures may not be adequate to safeguard our
Microcyn technology. In addition, we granted a security interest
in our assets, including our intellectual property, under two
loan and security agreements. If we do not protect our rights
adequately, third parties could use our technology, and our
ability to compete in the market would be reduced.
Although we have filed U.S. and foreign patent applications
related to our Microcyn based products, the manufacturing
technology for making the products, and their uses, only one
patent has been issued from these applications to date.
Our pending patent applications and any patent applications we
may file in the future may not result in issued patents, and we
do not know whether any of our in-licensed patents or any
additional patents that might ultimately be issued by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or foreign regulatory body
will protect our Microcyn technology. Any claims that issue may
not be sufficiently broad to prevent third parties from
producing competing substitutes and may be infringed, designed
around, or invalidated by third parties. Even issued patents may
later be found to be invalid, or may be modified or revoked in
proceedings instituted by third parties before various patent
offices or in courts.
The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is
more uncertain in part because legal means afford only limited
protection and may not adequately protect our rights, and we
will not be able to ensure that:
|
|
|
| |
|
we were the first to invent the inventions described in patent
applications;
|
| |
| |
|
we were the first to file patent applications for inventions;
|
| |
| |
|
others will not independently develop similar or alternative
technologies or duplicate our products without infringing our
intellectual property rights;
|
| |
| |
|
any patents licensed or issued to us will provide us with any
competitive advantages;
|
| |
| |
|
we will develop proprietary technologies that are
patentable; or
|
| |
| |
|
the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on our
ability to do business.
|
The policies we use to protect our trade secrets may not be
effective in preventing misappropriation of our trade secrets by
others. In addition, confidentiality and invention assignment
agreements executed by our employees, consultants and advisors
may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection
for our trade secrets or
13
other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use
or disclosures. We cannot be certain that the steps we have
taken will prevent the misappropriation and use of our
intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where
the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in
the United States. For example, one of our former contract
partners, Nofil Corporation, whom we relied upon to manufacture
our proprietary machines had access to our proprietary
information and we believe undertook the development and
manufacture of the machines to be sold to third parties in
violation of our agreement with such company. We have brought a
claim against Nofil Corporation in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California. We believe that a
former officer of our Mexico subsidiary collaborated in these
acts, misappropriated our trade secrets, and is currently
selling products in Mexico that are competitive with our
products. In addition, we believe that, through the licensor of
the patents that we in-license and who has also assigned patents
to us, a company in Japan obtained one of our patent
applications, translated it into Hangul and filed it under such
companys and the licensors name in South Korea.
These and any other leak of confidential data into the public
domain or to third parties could allow our competitors to learn
our trade secrets.
We may
face intellectual property infringement claims that could be
time-consuming, costly to defend and could result in our loss of
significant rights and, in the case of patent infringement
claims, the assessment of treble damages.
On occasion, we may receive notices of claims of infringement,
misappropriation or misuse of other parties proprietary
rights. We may have disputes regarding intellectual property
rights with the parties that have licensed those rights to us.
For example, in June 2006, we received written notice from
Coherent Technologies, the licensor of exclusive licenses to six
issued Japanese patents and five Japanese published pending
patent applications, advising us that the patent license was
terminated, citing various reasons with which we disagree. Since
that time, we have engaged in discussions with Coherent
Technologies concerning the license agreement and our continued
business relationship. Although we do not believe Coherent
Technologies has grounds to terminate the license, we may have
to take legal action to preserve our rights under the license
and to enjoin Coherent Technologies from breaching its terms.
Some claims received from third parties may lead to litigation.
We cannot assure you that we will prevail in these actions, or
that other actions alleging misappropriation or misuse by us of
third-party trade secrets, infringement by us of third-party
patents and trademarks or the validity of our patents, will not
be asserted or prosecuted against us. We may also initiate
claims to defend our intellectual property. For example, we
brought a claim against Nofil Corporation for misappropriation
of our trade secrets and Nofil Corporation filed a
cross-complaint against us in February 2007 claiming ownership
of our technology. Intellectual property litigation, regardless
of outcome, is expensive and time-consuming, could divert
managements attention from our business and have a
material negative effect on our business, operating results or
financial condition. In addition, the outcome of such litigation
may be unpredictable. If there is a successful claim of
infringement against us, we may be required to pay substantial
damages (including treble damages if we were to be found to have
willfully infringed a third partys patent) to the party
claiming infringement, develop non-infringing technology, stop
selling our products or using technology that contains the
allegedly infringing intellectual property or enter into royalty
or license agreements that may not be available on acceptable or
commercially practical terms, if at all. Our failure to develop
non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on
a timely basis could harm our business. In addition, modifying
our products to include the non-infringing technologies could
require us to seek re-approval or clearance from various
regulatory bodies for our products, which would be costly and
time consuming. Also, we may be unaware of pending patent
applications that relate to our technology. Parties making
infringement claims on future issued patents may be able to
obtain an injunction that would prevent us from selling our
products or using technology that contains the allegedly
infringing intellectual property, which could harm our business.
In September 2005, a complaint was filed against us in Mexico
claiming trademark infringement with respect to our Microcyn60
mark. To settle this claim we have agreed to cease marketing our
product in Mexico under the name Microcyn60 by September 2007. A
second unrelated claim was filed against us in Mexico in May
2006, claiming trademark infringement with respect to our
Microcyn60 mark in Mexico. We are in discussions with the
claimant to settle the matter.
In addition to the infringement claims in Mexico, we are
currently involved in several pending trademark opposition
proceedings in connection with our applications to register the
marks Microcyn, Oculus Microcyn and
14
Dermacyn in the European Union, Argentina, Guatemala,
Honduras, Nicaragua and Paraguay. If we are unable to settle
these disputes or prevail in these opposition proceedings, we
will not be able to obtain registrations for the Microcyn,
Oculus Microcyn and Dermacyn marks in those
countries, and that may impair our ability to enforce our
trademark rights against infringers in those countries. Although
no such legal proceedings have been brought or threats of such
legal proceedings have been made, we cannot rule out the
possibility that any of these opposing parties will also file a
trademark infringement lawsuit seeking to prevent our use and
seek monetary damages based on our use of the Microcyn,
Oculus Microcyn and Dermacyn marks in the European
Union, Argentina, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Paraguay.
We have also entered into agreements with third parties to
settle trademark opposition proceedings in which we have agreed
to certain restrictions on our use and registration of certain
marks. In March 2006, we entered into an agreement with an
opposing party that places restrictions on the manner in which
we can use and register our Microcyn and Microcyn60
marks in countries where the opposing party has superior
rights, including in Europe and Singapore. These restrictions
include always using Microcyn along with the word
technology and another distinctive trademark such as
Cidalcyn, Dermacyn and Vetericyn. In addition, we
have entered into an agreement with an opposing party in which
we agreed to limit our use and registration of the Microcyn
mark in Uruguay to disinfectant, antiseptic and sterilizing
agents. Moreover, we have entered into an agreement with an
opposing party in Europe in which we agreed to specifically
exclude ophthalmologic products for our Oculus Microcyn
application in the European Union.
Our
ability to generate revenue will be diminished if we are unable
to obtain acceptable prices or an adequate level of
reimbursement from third-party payors of healthcare
costs.
The continuing efforts of governmental and other third-party
payors, including managed care organizations such as health
maintenance organizations, or HMOs, to contain or reduce costs
of health care may affect our future revenue and profitability,
and the future revenue and profitability of our potential
customers, suppliers and collaborative or license partners and
the availability of capital. For example, in certain foreign
markets, pricing or profitability of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to government control. In the United
States, governmental and private payors have limited the growth
of health care costs through price regulation or controls,
competitive pricing programs and drug rebate programs. Our
ability to commercialize our products successfully will depend
in part on the extent to which appropriate coverage and
reimbursement levels for the cost of our Microcyn products and
related treatment are obtained from governmental authorities,
private health insurers and other organizations, such as HMOs.
There is significant uncertainty concerning third-party coverage
and reimbursement of newly approved medical products and drugs.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices
charged for medical products and services. Also, the trend
toward managed healthcare in the United States and the
concurrent growth of organizations such as HMOs, as well as
legislative proposals to reform healthcare or reduce government
insurance programs, may result in lower prices for or rejection
of our products. The cost containment measures that health care
payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any
health care reform could materially and adversely affect our
ability to generate revenues.
In addition, given ongoing federal and state government
initiatives directed at lowering the total cost of health care,
the United States Congress and state legislatures will likely
continue to focus on health care reform, the cost of
prescription pharmaceuticals and the reform of the Medicare and
Medicaid payment systems. While we cannot predict whether any
proposed cost-containment measures will be adopted, the
announcement or adoption of these proposals could reduce the
price that we receive for our Microcyn products in the future.
We
could be required to indemnify third parties for alleged
infringement, which could cause us to incur significant
costs.
Some of our distribution agreements contain commitments to
indemnify our distributors against liability arising from
infringement of third party intellectual property such as
patents. We may be required to indemnify our customers for
claims made against them or license fees they are required to
pay. If we are forced to indemnify for claims or to pay license
fees, our business and financial condition could be
substantially harmed.
15
A
significant part of our business is conducted outside of the
United States, exposing us to additional risks that may not
exist in the United States, which in turn could cause our
business and operating results to suffer.
We have international operations in Mexico and Europe. For the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and during
the three months ended June 30, 2007, approximately 78%,
72%, 35% and 69%, respectively, of our total revenue was
generated from sales outside of the United States. Our business
is highly regulated for the use, marketing and manufacturing of
our Microcyn products both domestically and internationally. Our
international operations are subject to risks, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
local political or economic instability;
|
| |
| |
|
changes in governmental regulation;
|
| |
| |
|
changes in import/export duties;
|
| |
| |
|
trade restrictions;
|
| |
| |
|
lack of experience in foreign markets;
|
| |
| |
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations in
certain foreign countries;
|
| |
| |
|
work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions;
|
| |
| |
|
difficulties in collecting accounts receivables on a timely
basis or at all; and
|
| |
| |
|
adverse tax consequences or overlapping tax structures.
|
We plan to continue to market and sale our products
internationally to respond to customer requirements and market
opportunities. We currently have international manufacturing
facilities in Mexico and The Netherlands. Establishing
operations in any foreign country or region presents risks such
as those described above as well as risks specific to the
particular country or region. In addition, until a payment
history is established over time with customers in a new
geography or region, the likelihood of collecting receivables
generated by such operations could be less than our
expectations. As a result, there is a greater risk that reserves
set with respect to the collection of such receivables may be
inadequate. If our operations in any foreign country are
unsuccessful, we could incur significant losses and we may not
achieve profitability.
In addition, changes in policies or laws of the United States or
foreign governments resulting in, among other things, changes in
regulations and the approval process, higher taxation, currency
conversion limitations, restrictions on fund transfers or the
expropriation of private enterprises, could reduce the
anticipated benefits of our international expansion. If we fail
to realize the anticipated revenue growth of our future
international operations, our business and operating results
could suffer.
Our
sales in international markets subject us to foreign currency
exchange and other risks and costs which could harm our
business.
A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from outside
the United States, primarily from Mexico. We anticipate that
revenues from international customers will continue to represent
a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable
future. Because we generate revenues in foreign currencies, we
are subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. The
functional currency of our Mexican subsidiary is the Mexican
Peso, and the functional currency of our subsidiary in The
Netherlands is the Euro. For the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements, the financial results of our foreign
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars on average
exchange rates during the applicable period. If the
U.S. dollar appreciates against the Mexican Peso or the
Euro, as applicable, the revenues we recognize from sales by our
subsidiaries will be adversely impacted. Foreign exchange gains
or losses as a result of exchange rate fluctuations in any given
period could harm our operating results and negatively impact
our revenues. Additionally, if the effective price of our
products were to increase as a result of fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates, demand for our products could decline
and adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
16
The
loss of key members of our senior management team, one of our
directors or our inability to retain highly skilled scientists,
technicians and salespeople could adversely affect our
business.
Our success depends largely on the skills, experience and
performance of key members of our executive management team,
including Hojabr Alimi, our Chief Executive Officer, and a
member of our Board of Directors and Robert Northey, our
Director of Research and Development. The efforts of these
people will be critical to us as we continue to develop our
products and attempt to commercialize products in the chronic
and acute wound care market. If we were to lose one or more of
these individuals, we may experience difficulties in competing
effectively, developing our technologies and implementing our
business strategies.
Our research and development programs depend on our ability to
attract and retain highly skilled scientists and technicians. We
may not be able to attract or retain qualified scientists and
technicians in the future due to the intense competition for
qualified personnel among medical technology businesses,
particularly in the San Francisco Bay Area. We also face
competition from universities and public and private research
institutions in recruiting and retaining highly qualified
personnel. In addition, our success depends on our ability to
attract and retain salespeople with extensive experience in
wound care and close relationships with the medical community,
including physicians and other medical staff. We may have
difficulties locating, recruiting or retaining qualified
salespeople, which could cause a delay or decline in the rate of
adoption of our products. If we are not able to attract and
retain the necessary personnel to accomplish our business
objectives, we may experience constraints that will adversely
affect our ability to support our research, development and
sales programs.
We maintain key-person life insurance only on Mr. Alimi. We
may discontinue this insurance in the future, it may not
continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or, if
continued, it may prove inadequate to compensate us for the loss
of Mr. Alimis services.
We may
be unable to manage our future growth effectively, which would
make it difficult to execute our business
strategy.
We may experience periods of rapid growth as we expand our
business, which will likely place a significant strain on our
limited personnel and other resources. Any failure by us to
manage our growth effectively could have an adverse effect on
our ability to achieve our commercialization goals.
Furthermore, we conduct business in a number of geographic
regions and are seeking to expand to other regions. We have not
established a physical presence in many of the international
regions in which we conduct or plan to conduct business, but
rather we manage our business from our headquarters in Northern
California. As a result, we conduct business at all times of the
day and night with limited personnel. If we fail to
appropriately target and increase our presence in these
geographic regions, we may not be able to effectively market and
sell our Microcyn products in these locations or we may not meet
our customers needs in a timely manner, which could
negatively affect our operating results.
Future growth will also impose significant added
responsibilities on management, including the need to identify,
recruit, train and integrate additional employees. In addition,
rapid and significant growth will place strain on our
administrative and operational infrastructure, including sales
and marketing and clinical and regulatory personnel. Our ability
to manage our operations and growth will require us to continue
to improve our operational, financial and management controls,
reporting systems and procedures. If we are unable to manage our
growth effectively, it may be difficult for us to execute our
business strategy.
The
wound care industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid
technological change. If our competitors are better able to
develop and market products that are less expensive or more
effective than any products that we may develop, our commercial
opportunity will be reduced or eliminated.
The wound care industry is highly competitive and subject to
rapid technological change. Our success depends, in part, upon
our ability to stay at the forefront of technological change and
maintain a competitive position.
We compete with large healthcare, pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, along with smaller or early-stage
companies that have collaborative arrangements with larger
pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government
agencies and other public and private research organizations.
Many of our competitors have
17
significantly greater financial resources and expertise in
research and development, manufacturing, pre-clinical testing,
conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and
marketing approved products than we do. Our competitors may:
|
|
|
| |
|
develop and patent processes or products earlier than we will;
|
| |
| |
|
develop and commercialize products that are less expensive or
more efficient than any products that we may develop;
|
| |
| |
|
obtain regulatory approvals for competing products more rapidly
than we will; and
|
| |
| |
|
improve upon existing technological approaches or develop new or
different approaches that render our technology or products
obsolete or non-competitive.
|
As a result, we may not be able to successfully commercialize
any future products.
The
success of our research and development efforts may depend on
our ability to find suitable collaborators to fully exploit our
capabilities. If we are unable to establish collaborations or if
these future collaborations are unsuccessful, our research and
development efforts may be unsuccessful, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
An important element of our business strategy will be to enter
into collaborative or license arrangements under which we
license our Microcyn technology to other parties for development
and commercialization. We expect that while we may initially
seek to conduct initial clinical trials on our drug candidates,
we may need to seek collaborators for a number of our potential
products because of the expense, effort and expertise required
to conduct additional clinical trials and further develop those
potential products candidates. Because collaboration
arrangements are complex to negotiate, we may not be successful
in our attempts to establish these arrangements. If we need
third party assistance in identifying and negotiating one or
more acceptable arrangements, it might be costly. Also, we may
not have products that are desirable to other parties, or we may
be unwilling to license a potential product because the party
interested in it is a competitor. The terms of any arrangements
that we establish may not be favorable to us. Alternatively,
potential collaborators may decide against entering into an
agreement with us because of our financial, regulatory or
intellectual property position or for scientific, commercial or
other reasons. If we are not able to establish collaborative
agreements, we may not be able to develop and commercialize new
products, which would adversely affect our business and our
revenues.
In order for any of these collaboration or license arrangements
to be successful, we must first identify potential collaborators
or licensees whose capabilities complement and integrate well
with ours. We may rely on these arrangements for, not only
financial resources, but also for expertise or economies of
scale that we expect to need in the future relating to clinical
trials, manufacturing, sales and marketing, and for licenses to
technology rights. However, it is likely that we will not be
able to control the amount and timing of resources that our
collaborators or licensees devote to our programs or potential
products. If our collaborators or licensees prove difficult to
work with, are less skilled than we originally expected, or do
not devote adequate resources to the program, the relationship
will not be successful. If a business combination, involving a
collaborator or licensee and a third party were to occur, the
effect could be to diminish, terminate or cause delays in
development of a potential product.
We may
acquire other businesses or form joint ventures that could harm
our operating results, dilute your ownership of us, increase our
debt or cause us to incur significant expense.
As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of
complementary businesses and assets, as well as technology
licensing arrangements. We also intend to pursue strategic
alliances that leverage our core technology and industry
experience to expand our product offerings or distribution. We
have no experience with respect to acquiring other companies and
limited experience with respect to the formation of
collaborations, strategic alliances and joint ventures. If we
make any acquisitions, we may not be able to integrate these
acquisitions successfully into our existing business, and we
could assume unknown or contingent liabilities. Any future
acquisitions by us also could result in significant write-offs
or the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, any of
which could harm our operating results. Integration of an
acquired company also may require management resources that
otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our
existing business. We may not identify or complete these
transactions
18
in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all, and we
may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition,
technology license, strategic alliance or joint venture.
To finance any acquisitions, we may choose to issue shares of
our common stock as consideration, which would dilute your
ownership interest in us. If the price of our common stock is
low or volatile, we may not be able to acquire other companies
for stock. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise
additional funds for acquisitions through public or private
financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that
are favorable to us, or at all.
If we
are unable to comply with broad and complex federal and state
fraud and abuse laws, including state and federal anti-kickback
laws, we could face substantial penalties and our products could
be excluded from government healthcare programs.
We are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to
healthcare fraud and abuse, which include, among other things,
anti-kickback laws that prohibit payments to induce
the referral of products and services, and false
claims statutes that prohibit the fraudulent billing of
federal healthcare programs. Our operations are subject to the
federal anti-kickback statute, a criminal statute that, subject
to certain statutory exceptions, prohibits any person from
knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or
receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce or
reward a person either (i) for referring an individual for
the furnishing of items or services for which payment may be
made in whole or in part by a government healthcare program such
as Medicare or Medicaid, or (ii) for purchasing, leasing,
or ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchasing,
leasing or ordering of an item or service for which payment may
be made under a government healthcare program. Because of the
breadth of the federal anti-kickback statute, the Office of
Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, or the OIG, was authorized to adopt regulations
setting forth additional exceptions to the prohibitions of the
statute commonly known as safe harbors. If all of
the elements of an applicable safe harbor are fully satisfied,
an arrangement will not be subject to prosecution under the
federal anti-kickback statute.
We previously had agreements to pay compensation to our advisory
board members and physicians who conduct clinical trials or
provide other services for us. Currently, these agreements have
been terminated. The agreements may be subject to challenge to
the extent they do not fall within relevant safe harbors under
federal and similar state anti-kickback laws. If our past or
present operations, including, but not limited to, our
consulting arrangements with our advisory board members or
physicians conducting clinical trials on our behalf, or our
promotional or discount programs, are found to be in violation
of these laws, we or our officers may be subject to civil or
criminal penalties, including large monetary penalties, damages,
fines, imprisonment and exclusion from government healthcare
program participation, including Medicare and Medicaid.
In addition, if there is a change in law, regulation or
administrative or judicial interpretations of these laws, we may
have to change our business practices or our existing business
practices could be challenged as unlawful, which could have a
negative effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex and even minor,
inadvertent irregularities can potentially give rise to claims
that a statute or regulation has been violated. The frequency of
suits to enforce these laws have increased significantly in
recent years and have increased the risk that a healthcare
company will have to defend a false claim action, pay fines or
be excluded from the Medicare, Medicaid or other federal and
state healthcare programs as a result of an investigation
arising out of such action. We cannot assure you that we will
not become subject to such litigation. Any violations of these
laws, or any action against us for violation of these laws, even
if we successfully defend against it, could harm our reputation,
be costly to defend and divert managements attention from
other aspects of our business. Similarly, if the physicians or
other providers or entities with whom we do business are found
to have violated abuse laws, they may be subject to sanctions,
which could also have a negative impact on us.
Our
efforts to discover and develop potential products may not lead
to the discovery, development, commercialization or marketing of
actual drug products.
We are currently engaged in a number of different approaches to
discover and develop new product applications and product
candidates. At the present time, we have one Microcyn-based drug
candidate in clinical
19
trials. We also have a non-Microcyn-based compound in the
research and development phase. We believe this compound has
potential applications in oncology. Discovery and development of
potential drug candidates are expensive and time-consuming, and
we do not know if our efforts will lead to discovery of any drug
candidates that can be successfully developed and marketed. If
our efforts do not lead to the discovery of a suitable drug
candidate, we may be unable to grow our clinical pipeline or we
may be unable to enter into agreements with collaborators who
are willing to develop our drug candidates.
We
must implement additional and expensive finance and accounting
systems, procedures and controls as we grow our business and
organization and to satisfy new reporting requirements, which
will increase our costs and require additional management
resources.
As a public reporting company, we are required to comply with
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the
Commission, including expanded disclosures and accelerated
reporting requirements and more complex accounting rules for the
reporting period ending March 31, 2008. Compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other
requirements will increase our costs and require additional
management resources. In a letter following their dismissal, our
prior independent auditors informed us that we did not have the
appropriate financial management and reporting structure in
place to meet the demands of a public company and that our
accounting and financial personnel lacked the appropriate level
of accounting knowledge, experience and training. Our current
independent auditors recommended certain changes in our internal
controls, which we are working on implementing. We have upgraded
our finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls and
will need to continue to implement additional finance and
accounting systems, procedures and controls as we grow our
business and organization, enter into complex business
transactions and take actions designed to satisfy new reporting
requirements. Specifically, our experience in entering into a
series of Agreements with Quimica Pasteur, or QP, a Mexico-based
distributor of pharmaceutical products to hospitals and health
care entities owned or operated by the Mexican Ministry of
Health, or MOH, indicated that we need to better plan for
complex transactions and the application of complex accounting
principles relating to those transactions and to better identify
potentially improper practices. As a result of these agreements,
we were required to consolidate QPs operations with our
financial results for a portion of our year ended March 31,
2006. In connection with our audit of QPs financial
statements in late 2005, we were made aware of a number of facts
that suggested that QP or its principals may have engaged in
some form of tax avoidance practice in Mexico prior to the
execution of the agreements between our company and QP, and we
did not discover these facts prior to our execution of these
agreements or for several months thereafter. If we are unable to
complete the required Section 404 assessment as to the
adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, if we
fail to maintain or implement adequate controls, or if our
independent registered public accounting firm is unable to
provide us with an unqualified report as to the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of the date of
our second Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for which compliance is required and thereafter, our ability to
obtain additional financing could be impaired. In addition,
investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our
internal control over financial reporting and in the accuracy of
our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. A lack of investor confidence in the reliability and
accuracy of our public reporting could cause our stock price to
decline. Also, if we are unable to implement and maintain
adequate internal controls, we could be subject to fines and
penalties. For example, although we do not believe that we are
responsible for any tax avoidance practices of QPs
principals prior to June 16, 2005, the Mexican taxing
authority could make a claim against us or our Mexican
subsidiary. We have been informed by counsel in Mexico that the
statute of limitations, including for action for fraud, is five
years from March 31, 2006.
We may
not be able to maintain sufficient product liability insurance
to cover claims against us.
Product liability insurance for the healthcare industry is
generally expensive to the extent it is available at all. We may
not be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or be
able to secure increased coverage if the commercialization of
our products progresses, nor can we be sure that existing or
future claims against us will be covered by our product
liability insurance. Moreover, the existing coverage of our
insurance policy or any rights of indemnification and
contribution that we may have may not be sufficient to offset
existing or future claims. A successful claim against us with
respect to uninsured liabilities or in excess of insurance
coverage and not subject to
20
any indemnification or contribution could have a material
adverse effect on our future business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
Our
operating results may fluctuate, which could cause our stock
price to decrease.
Fluctuations in our operating results may lead to fluctuations,
including declines, in our share price. Our operating results
and our share price may fluctuate from period to period due to a
variety of factors, including:
|
|
|
| |
|
demand by physicians, other medical staff and patients for our
Microcyn products;
|
| |
| |
|
reimbursement decisions by third-party payors and announcements
of those decisions;
|
| |
| |
|
clinical trial results and publication of results in
peer-reviewed journals or the presentation at medical
conferences;
|
| |
| |
|
the inclusion or exclusion of our Microcyn products in large
clinical trials conducted by others;
|
| |
| |
|
actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial
and operating results;
|
| |
| |
|
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or
other proprietary rights;
|
| |
| |
|
issues in manufacturing our product candidates or products;
|
| |
| |
|
new or less expensive products and services or new technology
introduced or offered by our competitors or us;
|
| |
| |
|
the development and commercialization of product enhancements;
|
| |
| |
|
changes in the regulatory environment;
|
| |
| |
|
delays in establishing new strategic relationships;
|
| |
| |
|
costs associated with collaborations and new product candidates;
|
| |
| |
|
introduction of technological innovations or new commercial
products by us or our competitors;
|
| |
| |
|
litigation or public concern about the safety of our product
candidates or products;
|
| |
| |
|
changes in recommendations of securities analysts or lack of
analyst coverage;
|
| |
| |
|
failure to meet analyst expectations regarding our operating
results;
|
| |
| |
|
additions or departures of key personnel; and
|
| |
| |
|
general market conditions.
|
Variations in the timing of our future revenues and expenses
could also cause significant fluctuations in our operating
results from period to period and may result in unanticipated
earning shortfalls or losses. In addition, the NASDAQ Global
Market, in general, and the market for life sciences companies,
in particular, have experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate
to the operating performance of those companies.
If an
active, liquid trading market for our common stock does not
develop, you may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at
or above the price you paid.
Prior to our initial public offering, there was no public market
for our common stock. Although we listed our common stock listed
on the NASDAQ Global Market, an active and liquid trading market
for our common stock has not yet and may not ever develop or be
sustained. You may not be able to sell your shares quickly or at
or above the price you paid for our stock if trading in our
stock is not active.
21
We do
not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. As a
result, you must rely on stock appreciation, if any, for a
return on your investment.
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock
in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends will
depend on our financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements and other factors and will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors. In addition, under two of
our secured loans, we will not pay any dividends without our
secured lenders prior written consent for as long as we
have any outstanding obligations to the secured lenders.
Accordingly, you will have to rely on appreciation in the price
of our common stock, if any, to earn a return on your investment
in our common stock. Furthermore, we may in the future become
subject to contractual restrictions on, or prohibitions against,
the payment of dividends.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter, by-laws and Delaware law may make it
more difficult for you to change our management and may also
make a takeover difficult.
Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that
limit the ability of stockholders to change our management and
may also enable our management to resist a takeover. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
| |
|
the ability of our Board of Directors to issue and designate the
rights of, without stockholder approval, up to
5,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock, which
rights could be senior to those of common stock;
|
| |
| |
|
limitations on persons authorized to call a special meeting of
stockholders; and
|
| |
| |
|
advance notice procedures required for stockholders to make
nominations of candidates for election as directors or to bring
matters before an annual meeting of stockholders.
|
These provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change of
control in our management. These provisions could also
discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and
other stockholders to elect directors and cause us to take other
corporate actions. In addition, the existence of these
provisions, together with Delaware law, might hinder or delay an
attempted takeover other than through negotiations with our
Board of Directors.
Our
stockholders may experience substantial dilution in the value of
their investment if we issue additional shares of our capital
stock.
Our charter documents allow us to issue up to
100,000,000 shares of our common stock and to issue and
designate the rights of, without stockholder approval, up to
5,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. In the
event we issue additional shares of our capital stock, dilution
to our stockholders could result. In addition, if we issue and
designate a class of convertible preferred stock, these
securities may provide for rights, preferences or privileges
senior to those of holders of our common stock.
22
DISCLOSURE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
When used in this prospectus, the words expects,
anticipates, intends,
estimates, plans, projects,
continue, ongoing,
potential, expect, predict,
believe, intend, may,
will, should, could,
would and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These are statements that
relate to future periods and include statements about, but not
limited to: the progress and timing of our development programs
and regulatory approvals for our products; the benefits and
effectiveness of our products; our position as a worldwide
leader using anti-infectives; the development of protocols for
clinical studies; enrollment in clinical studies; the progress
and timing of clinical trials and physician studies; our
expectations related to the use of proceeds from our initial
public offering; our ability to manufacture sufficient amounts
of our product candidates for clinical trials and products for
commercialization activities; the outcome of discussions with
the FDA and other regulatory agencies; the content and timing of
submissions to, and decisions made by, the FDA and other
regulatory agencies, including demonstrating to the satisfaction
of the FDA the safety and efficacy of our products; the ability
of our products to meet existing or future regulatory standards;
the rate and causes of infection; the accuracy of our estimates
of the size and characteristics of the markets which may be
addressed by our products; our expectations and capabilities
relating to the sales and marketing of our current products and
our product candidates; the execution of distribution
agreements; the expansion of our sales force and distribution
network; the establishment of strategic partnerships for the
development or sale of products; the timing and aggressiveness
of commercializing our products; our ability to take advantage
of additional market opportunities; our ability to maintain a
market presence in the medical community; our ability to protect
our intellectual property and operate our business without
infringing on the intellectual property of others; our ability
to continue to expand our intellectual property portfolio; our
expectations about the outcome of litigation and controversies
with third parties; our ability to attract and retain qualified
directors, officers and employees; our relationship with QP; our
ability to compete with other companies that are developing or
selling products that are competitive with our products; our
ability to retain experienced suppliers; the ability of our
products to become the standard of care for controlling
infection in chronic and acute wounds; the advantages of our
products over current methods of care in the treatment of
chronic and acute wounds; our expectations and capabilities
relating to the effectiveness of our product; our ability to
expand to and commercialize products in markets outside the
wound care market; our estimates regarding future operating
performance, earnings and capital requirements; our expectations
with respect to our microbiology contract testing laboratory;
our expectations relating to the concentration of our revenue
from international sales; and the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and any future changes in accounting regulations or
practices in general with respect to public companies.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as
well as our ability to develop and commercialize new products;
the risk of unanticipated delays in research and development
efforts; the risk that we may not obtain reimbursement for our
existing test and any future products we may develop; the risks
and uncertainties associated with the regulation of our products
by the FDA; the ability to compete against third parties; our
ability to obtain capital when needed; our history of operating
losses and the risks set forth under Risks Factors
above. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking
to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any
change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement
is based.
We will not receive any proceeds from the disposition of the
shares of common stock, or interests therein, covered by this
prospectus. An aggregate of 1,760,906 shares of common
stock covered by this prospectus are issuable only upon the
exercise of warrants issued to the selling stockholders. Upon
the cash exercise of the warrants, we could receive cash
proceeds of up to $18,479,155.70. There can be no assurance any
of these warrants will be exercised by the selling stockholders,
or, if exercised, that we will receive any cash proceeds upon
such exercises. Any cash proceeds received from the exercise of
the warrants will be added to working capital and used for
general corporate purposes.
23
We are registering the shares of common stock covered by this
prospectus on behalf of the selling stockholders named in the
following table. The term selling stockholders
includes the person listed below and his respective transferees,
pledgees, donees, or other successors. The table below sets
forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of
our common stock by each of the selling stockholders as of
August 15, 2007. Information with respect to beneficial
ownership is based on data provided by the selling stockholders.
Information with respect to shares owned beneficially after the
offering assumes the exercise of all warrants listed in the
table and the sale of the shares offered and no other purchases
or sales of common stock.
Unless otherwise described below, to our knowledge, no selling
stockholder nor any of its affiliates has held any position or
office with, or been employed by or otherwise has had any
material relationship with us or our affiliates during the three
years prior to the date of this prospectus.
Certain of the selling stockholders in the table below acquired
the shares of common stock and the warrants to which this
prospectus relates from us in a private placement which closed
on August 13, 2007. In the private placement, we issued
1,262,500 shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase up to an additional 416,622 shares of our common
stock; we also issued an additional warrant to purchase up to
88,375 shares of our common stock to Rodman &
Renshaw, LLC, or Rodman & Renshaw, as compensation for
its services as placement agent in the private placement. As
part of the private placement, we entered into a registration
rights agreement with the investors covering the resale of the
common stock sold in the private placement and the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Pursuant to
these registration rights, the shares of common stock issued to
the investors in the private placement and the shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants issued in the
private placement are being registered hereunder. As to shares
being sold by Rodman & Renshaw for its own account,
Rodman & Renshaw is an underwriter. Rodman &
Renshaw received its warrant in the ordinary course of business.
We are also registering up to 1,482,363 shares of common
stock, including 1,255,909 shares issuable upon exercise of
warrants, all of which are being offered for resale for the
accounts of the selling stockholders. Some of these shares are
being registered pursuant to piggyback registration
rights that we granted to the stockholders or warrant
holders. The shares being registered were acquired from us in
various transactions and are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 234,746 shares of our common
stock issued to the underwriters in our initial public offering
in 2007.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 29,129 shares of our common
stock and 145,652 shares of our common stock issued in 2006
to investors in a preferred stock financing.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 24,127 shares of our common
stock issued in 2006 to the placement agent in a private stock
financing.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 319,445 shares of our common
stock issued in 2006 to the placement agent in a private stock
financing, and 555 shares of our common stock that have
been issued upon exercise of a similar warrant.
|
| |
| |
|
45,832 shares of common stock issued to an investor in a
private stock financing in 2005.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 391,908 shares of our common
stock issued in 2005 to the placement agent in a private stock
financing, and 16,666 shares of our common stock have been
issued upon exercise of three similar warrants.
|
| |
| |
|
16,666 shares of common stock issued to an investor in a
private stock financing in 2004 and 1,083 shares of common
stock received by such investor as a stock dividend on such
shares.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 18,275 shares of our common
stock issued in connection with bridge financings in 2004 and
2005.
|
24
|
|
|
| |
|
A warrant to purchase up to 16,666 shares of our common
stock issued to a lender in connection with an equipment
financing arrangement in 2005.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 71,521 shares of our common
stock issued in connection with an equipment financing
arrangement in 2006.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 100,093 shares of our common
stock issued between 2005 and 2007 to consultants and advisors
who performed services for us.
|
| |
| |
|
Warrants to purchase up to 49,999 shares of our common
stock issued in connection with the settlement of litigation in
2006.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
Offering that
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
are Issuable
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
After the
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
of Warrants)
|
|
|
of Warrants
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering(1)(2)
|
|
|
Shares Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Aristeia International Limited
|
|
|
84,575
|
|
|
|
27,909
|
|
|
|
112,484
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
112,484
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Aristeia Partners L.P.
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
13,980
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
13,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Aristeia Special Investments
Master, L.P.
|
|
|
29,913
|
|
|
|
9,871
|
|
|
|
39,784
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
39,784
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Avendis Absolute Alternative 1
Trading Ltd(3)
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
11,550
|
|
|
|
46,550
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
46,550
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Cranshire Capital, L.P.(4)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Crescent International Ltd(5)
|
|
|
56,900
|
|
|
|
12,705
|
|
|
|
69,605
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
51,205
|
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Diamond Opportunity
Fund, LLC(6)
|
|
|
43,750
|
|
|
|
14,437
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Double U Master Fund LP(7)
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Egatniv, LLC
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Graham Anderson
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery
Fund
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
82,500
|
|
|
|
332,500
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
332,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Highbridge International LLC(8)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
12,375
|
|
|
|
49,875
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
49,875
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Lincoln Biotech Ventures II,
L.P.
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Otago Partners, LLC
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Perceptive Life Sciences Master
Fund LTD(9)
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
57,750
|
|
|
|
232,750
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
232,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Catalytix LDC Life Science
Hedge AC
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Rockmore Investment Master
Fund Ltd(10)
|
|
|
43,750
|
|
|
|
14,437
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
RRC Biofund, LP(11)
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
34,650
|
|
|
|
169,650
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
139,650
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Whalehaven Capital
Fund Limited(12)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Daniel B. and Linda O. Ahlberg
Trustees FBO Ahlberg Joint Revocable Trust u/a dtd 8/27/06
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
8,985
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Alice Ann Corporation
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
11,610
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
9,310
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert G. Allison
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
William H. Baxter Trustee FBO
William H. Baxter Revocable Trust u/a dtd 7/3/96
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
8,320
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
William H. Baxter IRA
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
David & Carole Brown
Trustees FBO David & Carole Brown Revocable Trust u/a
dtd 10/23/97
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
25
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
Offering that
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
are Issuable
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
After the
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
of Warrants)
|
|
|
of Warrants
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering(1)(2)
|
|
|
Shares Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
Robert H. Clayburgh IRA
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
8,645
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Gary & Leslie Clipper
JTWROS
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO Mark
Donahoe IRA
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
15,640
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,640
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Dennis D. Gonyea
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Richard A. Hoel
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Elizabeth J. Kuehne
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
Elizabeth J. Kuehne IRA
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
Michael E. McElligott SPN/PRO
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
Charles W. Pappas IRA
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
John T. Potter
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Carolyn Salon
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Joel A. Salon
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Paul C. Seel & Nancy S.
Seel JTWROS
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
10,050
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
E. Terry Skone, TTEE FBO E. Terry
Skone Revocable Trust U/A
dtd 11/30/05
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Donald O. & Janet M. Voight
TTEEs FBO Janet M. Voight Trust U/A dtd 8/29/96
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
James B. Wallace SPN/PRO
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
David M. Westrum, TTEE FBO David M.
Westrum Revocable Living Trust u/a dtd 6/1/97
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Piper Jaffray as Custodian FBO
Michael R. Wilcox IRA
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Pyramid Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8,250
|
|
|
|
33,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
33,250
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Rodman & Renshaw LLC(13)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
88,375
|
|
|
|
88,375
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
88,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Brookstreet Securities
Corporation(13)(14)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
187,139
|
|
|
|
187,139
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
|
|
162,139
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Roth Capital Partners, LLC(13)(15)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
129,111
|
|
|
|
129,111
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
129,111
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Maxim Group, LLC(12)(16)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
46,949
|
|
|
|
46,949
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
46,949
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Anchor Venture Trust(17)
|
|
|
209,233
|
|
|
|
29,129
|
|
|
|
238,362
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
|
238,362
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
WWIII Enterprises LLC(18)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
102,717
|
|
|
|
102,717
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
102,717
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
William H. Watson III
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
167,808
|
|
|
|
167,808
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
167,808
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
David Braeger(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Acceleron Capital Ltd.(20)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
David SaoMarcos(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
AJ Sexton, V.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14,424
|
|
|
|
14,424
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14,424
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Ronald Smith(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,521
|
|
|
|
7,521
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,521
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Carole Smith and Ronald Smith,
Community Property
|
|
|
42,447
|
|
|
|
4,396
|
|
|
|
46,843
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
14,396
|
|
|
|
32,447
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Jamie Hamamoto
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Alan Harp(19)
|
|
|
17,749
|
|
|
|
29,435
|
|
|
|
47,214
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
29,435
|
|
|
|
17,749
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
26
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
Offering that
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
are Issuable
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
After the
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
of Warrants)
|
|
|
of Warrants
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering(1)(2)
|
|
|
Shares Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
James B. Stanley
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37,188
|
|
|
|
37,188
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
37,188
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Richard L. Kerbs(19)
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
15,858
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert Schultz(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Timothy Sherer(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Randy Millen
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Russ Huffington(19)
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
5,989
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Nicolas Pilger(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Gary Wohrle(19)(21)
|
|
|
12,400
|
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Eric Elliot(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Edward Villarreal
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert Fukunaga(19)(22)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
11,791
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
David Singer(19)
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,579
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert Badolato(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Darrel Smith(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Steven Wilson
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Dayl Crow(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,312
|
|
|
|
10,312
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,312
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
William Peterson(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Bruce Barber(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Cheryl Sillings(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Burton Bartlett(19)
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
12,866
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Wayne Palmer(19)
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Phil Rosenbaum(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Larry Burkholder(19)
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Stanley C. Brooks(19)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
134,887
|
|
|
|
134,887
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
134,887
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Remington Partners, Inc.(23)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9,493
|
|
|
|
9,493
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
9,493
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Ralph A. Anavy(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Regina M. Anavy(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Joseph Abrams and Patricia
Abrams(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Sarah Abrams(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Matt Abrams(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Warren P. Yost and Gail A. Yost(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Edward R. Pierce, Trustee of Regina
Bublil Waldman separate declaration of trust
dtd 12/14/1984(24)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Leo and Jacqueline McCarthy
LLC(24)(25)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Venture Lending and Leasing III,
LLC(26)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Venture Lending and Leasing IV,
LLC(26)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
71,521
|
|
|
|
71,521
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
71,521
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Phillips, Spalla &
Angstadt LLP(27)(28)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,593
|
|
|
|
7,593
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,593
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Robert C. Burlingame(27)(29)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Barnett Cline(27)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Gerald Woolam(27)
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Paul Schnur(27)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Don C. Wukash(27)
|
|
|
4,166
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
7,291
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
4,166
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Linda T. Wukash(30)
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
7,292
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
27
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
Offering that
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Issuable
|
|
|
are Issuable
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Owned Before
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
After the
|
|
|
Owned After
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
of Warrants)
|
|
|
of Warrants
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering(1)(2)
|
|
|
Shares Offered
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Kelderman(31)(32)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Mcguinn, Hillsman &
Palefsky(31)(33)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%. |
| |
|
(1) |
|
There were 13,157,494 shares of common stock outstanding as
of August 15, 2007. |
| |
|
(2) |
|
In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially
owned by a selling stockholder and the percentage ownership of
that selling stockholder, we deemed outstanding shares of common
stock subject to the warrants. We did not deem these shares
outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other selling stockholder. |
| |
|
(3) |
|
Yannis Bilquez has sole voting control and investment discretion
with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(4) |
|
Mitchell P. Kopin, in his capacity as the president of Downsview
Capital, Inc., the general partner or this selling stockholder,
has sole voting control and investment discretion with respect
to the common stock held by this selling stockholder. Each of
Mitchell P. Kopin, and Downsview Capital, Inc. disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares held by Cranshire Capital,
L.P. |
| |
|
(5) |
|
Maxi Brezzi and Bachir Taleb-Ibrahimi have shared voting control
and investment discretion with respect to the common stock held
by this selling stockholder. |
| |
|
(6) |
|
David Holein, Rob Rubin and Richard Marks, in their capacities
as Manager and Managing Directors, respectively, of Diamond
Asset Management, the manager of this selling stockholder have
shared voting control and investment discretion with respect to
the common stock held by this selling stockholder.
Messrs. Holein, Rubin and Marks disclaim beneficial
ownership of the common stock held by Diamond Opportunity Fund,
LLC. |
| |
|
(7) |
|
Issac Winehouse has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(8) |
|
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC is the trading manager of
Highbridge International LLC and has voting control and
investment discretion over the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. Glenn Dubin and Henry Swieca control Highbridge
Capital Management, LLC and have voting control and investment
discretion over the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. Each of Highbridge Capital Management, LLC, Glenn
Dubin and Henry Swieca disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities held by Highbridge International LLC. |
| |
|
(9) |
|
Perceptive Advisors LLC has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(10) |
|
Rockmore Capital, LLC (Rockmore Capital) and
Rockmore Partners, LLC (Rockmore Partners), each a
limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of
Delaware, serve as investment manager and general partner,
respectively, to Rockmore Investments (US) LP, a Delaware
limited partnership, which invests all of its assets through
this selling stockholder. By reason of such relationships,
Rockmore Capital and Rockmore Partners may be deemed to share
dispositive power over the common stock owned by this selling
stockholder. Rockmore Capital and Rockmore Partners disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares held by Rockmore Investment
Master Fund Ltd. Rockmore Partners has delegated authority
to Rockmore Capital regarding the portfolio management decisions
with respect to the shares owned by this selling stockholder
and, as of August 15, 2007, Bruce T. Bernstein and Brian
Daly, as officers of Rockmore Capital, are responsible for the
portfolio management decisions of the common stock held by this
selling stockholder. By reason of such authority,
Messrs. Bernstein and Daly may be deemed to share
dispositive power over the shares owned by this selling
stockholder. Messrs. Bernstein and Daly disclaim beneficial
ownership of the common stock held by |
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd., and neither of such
persons has any legal right to maintain such authority. No other
person has sole or shared voting or dispositive power with
respect to the shares as those terms are used for purposes under
Regulation 13D-G
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. No person or
group (as that term is used in Section 13(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
SECs
Regulation 13D-G)
controls this selling stockholder. |
| |
|
(11) |
|
James A. Silverman has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(12) |
|
Michael Finkelstein, Arthur Jones and Trevor Williams, the
Investment Manager and Directors, respectively, of this selling
stockholder have shared voting control and investment discretion
with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(13) |
|
This selling stockholder is a registered broker-dealer, and
accordingly, an underwriter within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. |
| |
|
(14) |
|
Stanley C. Brooks has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(15) |
|
Brian C. Roth and Gordon J. Roth, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of this selling
stockholder have shared voting control and investment discretion
with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(16) |
|
Michael Rubinowitz has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(17) |
|
This selling stockholder received its shares by participating in
private stock financings. |
| |
|
(18) |
|
William H. Watson III has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(19) |
|
This selling stockholder is or may be an affiliate of a
broker-dealer. This selling stockholder has represented to us
that it has no agreements or understandings, directly or
indirectly, with any person to distribute any shares of common
stock subject to the warrants. |
| |
|
(20) |
|
James B. Stanley has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(21) |
|
Includes 1,774 shares held in joint trust with right of
survivorship with Mr. Wohrles spouse. |
| |
|
(22) |
|
Includes 8,333 shares held in a family trust of which
Mr. Fukanaga is a trustee. |
| |
|
(23) |
|
This selling stockholder received its warrants to purchase our
common stock in connection with a bridge financing entered into
by us. Mark Litwin has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(24) |
|
This selling stockholder was assigned his, her or its warrant to
purchase our common stock by Remington Partners, Inc., one of
our bridge lenders. |
| |
|
(25) |
|
Jacqueline McCarthy has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(26) |
|
This selling stockholder received its warrant to purchase our
common stock in connection with an equipment financing
arrangement. Martin Eng, the Chief Financial Officer of this
selling stockholder, has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
| |
|
(27) |
|
This selling stockholder received its shares of common stock
and/or warrant to purchase our common stock in connection with
consultant or advisory services rendered to us. |
| |
|
(28) |
|
Robert K. Phillips has sole voting control and investment
discretion with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
29
|
|
|
|
(29) |
|
Mr. Burlingame is one of our creditors pursuant to the
bridge loan entered into by us in November 2006 and amended in
March 2007 and is also a member of our board of directors. The
shares beneficially owned before offering that are issuable upon
exercise of warrants includes an option to purchase
75,000 shares of our common stock that is exercisable
within 60 days of August 15, 2007. We have assumed the
exercise of the option for purposes of computing Mr.
Burlingames beneficial ownership. |
| |
|
(30) |
|
Ms. Wukash was assigned her warrant to purchase our common
stock by Don Wukash, who received his warrant to purchase our
common stock in connection with advisory services rendered to us. |
| |
|
(31) |
|
This selling stockholder received its warrant to purchase our
common stock in connection with the settlement of litigation. |
| |
|
(32) |
|
Mr. Kelderman was our Chief Operating Officer until January
2005. |
| |
|
(33) |
|
Cliff Palefsky has sole voting control and investment discretion
with respect to the common stock held by this selling
stockholder. |
30
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value
per share. The following describes our common stock and
preferred stock and summarizes certain provisions of our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws. For additional
information about our capital stock, please refer to our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Common
Stock
As of August 15, 2007, there were 13,157,494 shares of
common stock outstanding held by approximately 815 registered
stockholders of record.
Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each
share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders. We have not provided for cumulative voting for the
election of directors in our certificate of incorporation. This
means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can
elect all of the directors then standing for election. Subject
to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock
outstanding at the time, the holders of outstanding shares of
our common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of assets
legally available at the times and in the amounts that our board
of directors may determine from time to time.
Holders of common stock have no preemptive subscription,
redemption or conversion rights or other subscription rights.
Upon our liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up,
the holders of common stock are entitled to share in all assets
remaining after payment of all liabilities and the liquidation
preferences of any outstanding preferred stock. Each outstanding
share of common stock is, and all shares of common stock to be
issued in this offering, when they are paid for will be, fully
paid and nonassessable.
Preferred
Stock
Our board of directors is authorized, subject to limitations
imposed by Delaware law, to issue up to a total of
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series,
without stockholder approval. Our board is authorized to
establish from time to time the number of shares to be included
in each series, and to fix the rights, preferences and
privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any
of its qualifications, limitations or restrictions. Our board
can also increase or decrease the number of shares of any
series, but not below the number of shares of that series then
outstanding, without any further vote or action by the
stockholders.
The board may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could harm the voting power or
other rights of the holders of the common stock. The issuance of
preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with
possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could, among
other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control of us and might harm the market
price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of the
holders of common stock. We have no current plans to issue any
shares of preferred stock.
Description
of Warrants
The common stock underlying warrants to be registered on behalf
of the selling stockholders pursuant to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is part were issued at
various times between July 2003 and August 2007 and shall
be exercisable for 1,760,906 shares of our common stock at
various times at exercise prices ranging from of $3.00 to $18.00
per share. The warrants for 504,997 shares of our common
stock issued in connection with the private placement that
closed on August 13, 2007 will be exercisable at any time
after February 10, 2008 and the exercise price of such
warrants will be adjusted in the event that we offer securities
after their issuance for consideration per share less than or
equal to the then-effective exercise price of such warrant. No
other of our warrants for the purchase of common stock contain
price-based anti-dilution provisions. The rights of the shares
of our common stock issuable upon exercise of all of our
outstanding warrants shall be the same as those described under
the heading Common Stock above.
31
Each selling stockholder and any of their pledgees, assignees
and
successors-in-interest
may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of
common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market or any other stock
exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are
traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed
or negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may use any one
or more of the following methods when selling shares:
|
|
|
| |
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
|
| |
| |
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the
shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the
block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
|
| |
| |
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the
broker-dealer for its account;
|
| |
| |
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the
applicable exchange;
|
| |
| |
|
privately negotiated transactions;
|
| |
| |
|
settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date
of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;
|
| |
| |
|
broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a
specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
|
| |
| |
|
through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging
transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
|
| |
| |
|
a combination of any such methods of sale; or
|
| |
| |
|
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
The selling stockholders may also sell shares under
Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933 if available,
rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange
for other brokers dealers to participate in sales.
Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the
selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for
the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be
negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this
prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess
of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, NASD
Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a
markup or markdown in compliance with NASD IM-2440.
In connection with the sale of the common stock or interests
therein, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging
transactions with broker-dealers or other financial
institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the
common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume.
The selling stockholders may also sell shares of the common
stock short and deliver these securities to close out their
short positions, or loan or pledge the common stock to
broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The
selling stockholders may also enter into option or other
transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions
or the creation of one or more derivative securities which
require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial
institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares
such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell
pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to
reflect such transaction).
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that
are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act in connection with such sales. Any selling stockholders that
are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers will be
deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the
Securities Act in connection with any sales of the shares by
them. In such event, any discounts, commissions or concessions
received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the
resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be
underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.
Of the selling stockholders, Rodman & Renshaw,
Brookstreet Securities Corporation, Maxim Group, LLC and Roth
Capital Partners, LLC is each a broker-dealer. Each of the
selling stockholders has informed us that it does not have
32
any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or
indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities subject
to the Registration Statement.
We are contractually required to pay certain fees and expenses
incurred by us incident to the registration of the shares held
by selling stockholders who have these contractual rights. We
have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders that have
contractual registration rights against certain losses, claims,
damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
Because selling stockholders may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act including Rule 172
thereunder. There is no underwriter or coordinating broker
acting in connection with the proposed sale of the resale shares
by the selling stockholders.
We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of
(1) the date on which the shares may be resold by the
selling stockholders without registration and without regard to
any volume limitations by reason of Rule 144(k) under the
Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect or
(2) all of the shares have been sold pursuant to this
prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any
other rule of similar effect. The shares will be sold only
through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required
under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain
states, the shares may not be sold unless they have been
registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an
exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is
available and is complied with.
Under applicable rules and regulations under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, any person engaged in the distribution of
the shares may not simultaneously engage in market making
activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable
restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the
commencement of the distribution. In addition, the selling
stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including
Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and
sales of shares of the common stock by the selling stockholders
or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus
available to the selling stockholders and have informed them of
the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser
at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance
with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).
The validity of the common stock offered by this prospectus is
being passed upon for us by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP,
Palo Alto, California.
The consolidated financial statements of Oculus Innovative
Sciences, Inc. incorporated in this prospectus by reference to
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended March 31, 2007 have been so incorporated
in reliance on the report of Marcum & Kliegman LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given upon the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock
offered by this prospectus. When used in this prospectus, the
term registration statement includes amendments to
the registration statement as well as the exhibits, schedules,
financial statements and notes filed as part of the registration
statement. Some information in the registration statement has
been eliminated from this prospectus in accordance with the
rules of the SEC. For further information with respect to us and
the common stock offered by this prospectus, reference is made
to the registration statement.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may access our publicly
filed reports and amendments to any of these reports free of
charge on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also read and copy any of the documents referenced above
at the SECs Public
33
Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington DC
20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference some of the
information we file with them, which means we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those
documents, and that some of the information in those documents
is considered to be a part of this prospectus.
The documents we are incorporating by reference in this
prospectus are:
|
|
|
| |
|
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2006, as amended on
July 27, 2007;
|
| |
| |
|
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007;
|
| |
| |
|
our Current Reports on
Forms 8-K
and 8-K/A,
filed with the SEC on April 25, 2007, May 2, 2007,
June 12, 2007, August 9, 2007, August 13, 2007
and August 17, 2007 (except as to the information furnished
pursuant to Item 2.02 and any related exhibits filed
pursuant to Item 9.01 (Results of Operations and Financial
Condition) of
Form 8-K); and
|
| |
| |
|
our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on
August 17, 2007 (except as to information furnished under
SEC rules and not filed).
|
We will furnish without charge to you, on written or oral
request, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by
reference, other than exhibits to those documents. You should
direct any requests for documents to Corporate Secretary, Oculus
Innovative Sciences, Inc., 1129 N. McDowell Blvd.,
Petaluma, CA 94954, or call
(707) 782-0792.
We also provide links to our reports and other information filed
with the Commission at the following web address:
http://ir.oculusis.com/sec.cfm. We do not consider information
contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website to be
part of this prospectus.
34
3,249,860 Shares
Common Stock
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2007
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
|
The following table sets forth the various expenses expected to
be incurred by the Registrant in connection with the sale and
distribution of the securities being registered hereby. All
amounts listed are estimated except the Securities and Exchange
Commission registration fee.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides for the indemnification of officers, directors, and
other corporate agents in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify
such persons under certain circumstances for liabilities
(including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act). The
Registrants Restated Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws, each as amended, provide for indemnification of the
Registrants directors, officers, employees and other
agents to the extent and under the circumstances permitted by
the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Registrant has also
entered into agreements with our directors and officers that
will require the Registrant, among other things, to indemnify
them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of
their status or service as directors or officers to the fullest
extent not prohibited by law.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities
Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons
controlling the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions,
the Registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in
such Act and is therefore unenforceable.
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
Exercises
of Stock Options
On various dates between July 31, 2004 and July 31,
2007, the Registrant issued 329,328 shares of its common
stock pursuant to the exercise of options granted under our
1999, 2000, 2003 and 2004 stock plans. The exercise prices per
share ranged from $0.11 to $3.00, for an aggregate consideration
of $301,209.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the
Securities Act, as transactions under compensatory benefit plans
and contracts relating to compensation as provided under
Rule 701. The sale of the above securities in a
12 months period did not exceed the greater of
(a) $1,000,000, (b) 15% of total assets as of the
Registrants most recent balance sheet or (c) 15% of
the number of outstanding shares of the Registrants common
stock sold in reliance on this Rule.
Issuances
of Capital Stock in Financing Rounds
On various dates between April 30, 2004 and
October 27, 2005, the Registrant sold 2,635,744 shares
of series B convertible preferred stock for aggregate
consideration of $47,445,663 to 361 accredited investors. In
connection with these sales the Registrant paid to Brookstreet
Securities Corporation (Brookstreet), as placement
agent, an aggregate of $3,413,818 in commissions and issued to
Brookstreet and its affiliates warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 329,471 shares of the Registrants common stock.
II-1
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
accredited investors, represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
In September and October 2006, the Registrant sold
193,045 units, consisting of 193,045 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock at a per unit price of
$18.00, and warrants to purchase 38,603 shares of common
stock at $18.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of
$3,474,450 to one qualified institutional buyer and one
institutional accredited investor. In connection with this sale,
the Registrant paid to Brookstreet as placement agent, an
aggregate of $347,444 in commissions and issued to Brookstreet
fully vested warrants to purchase an aggregate of
24,127 shares of the Registrants common stock.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited
investors, represented their intention to acquire the securities
for investment only and not with a view to or for sale with any
distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were affixed to
the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
On August 13, 2007, the Registrant closed a private
placement of 1,262,500 newly-issued shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 416,622 shares of common stock for
gross proceeds of approximately $10.1 million, before
placement fees and offering expenses to 45 accredited investors.
The shares were priced at $8.00 per share. The warrants, which
have a term of five years have an exercise price of $9.50 per
share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. In
connection with these sales, the Registrant paid to
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC (Rodman), as
placement agent, an aggregate of $707,000 in commissions and
issued to Rodman warrants to purchase an aggregate of
88,375 shares of the Registrants common stock.
The sales of the above securities were considered to be exempt
from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchasers of these securities were
accredited investors, represented their intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. All purchasers had adequate access, through their
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
Issuance
of Securities in Debt Financing
In June 2006, the Registrant entered into a loan and security
agreement with a financial institution. In conjunction with this
agreement, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 71,521 shares of its series B preferred
stock at an exercise price of $18.00 per share. The sale of
these securities was considered to be exempt from registration
under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The
purchaser was an accredited investor, represented its intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or for sale with any distribution thereof, and
appropriate legends were affixed to the instruments issued in
the transaction. The purchaser had access, through its
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
Issuance
of Securities to Consultant
In November 2006, the Registrant issued a warrant to purchase an
aggregate of 75,000 shares of its common stock at an
exercise price equal to $8.00 per share to a consultant
providing consulting services for the Registrant. The sale of
these securities was considered to be exempt from registration
under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The
purchaser is an accredited investor, represented his intention
to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or for sale with any distribution thereof, and
appropriate legends were affixed to the
II-2
instruments issued in the transaction. The purchaser had access,
through its relationship with the Registrant, to information
about the Registrant.
Issuance
of Securities for Finders Fee
On November 7, 2006, the Registrant signed a loan agreement
with Robert Burlingame, one of its directors, under which
Mr. Burlingame advanced to the Registrant
$4.0 million, which accrues interest at an annual rate of
7% (the Bridge Loan). The principal and all
accrued interest under the loan agreement, which is available to
the Registrant as working capital, will become due and payable
in full on the earlier of November 10, 2007 or five days
after the completion of an initial public offering of the
Registrants common stock resulting in gross proceeds to it
of at least $30.0 million. The loan is secured by all of
the Registrants assets, other than its intellectual
property, but is subordinate to the security interest held by
its secured lenders. On March 29, 2007, the Registrant
amended the terms of the Bridge Loan such that the Registrant is
making monthly interest payments on the $4.0 million
principal of the Bridge Loan and has deposited $2.0 million
into a segregated interest-bearing account and has agreed to
deposit an additional $2.0 million into this account if its
cash and cash equivalents drop below $10.0 million
(including the amounts in this account). The Registrant may
withdraw accrued interest from this account at any time, but has
agreed not to withdraw principal amounts from this account
without the prior consent of Mr. Burlingame. The Registrant
agreed that if it received unrestricted funds from the issuance
of debt, or equity funding, in excess of $500,000 prior to
November 7, 2007, it would pay such amounts to
Mr. Burlingame to reduce the amounts owing pursuant to the
Bridge Loan. The closing of the Registrants private
placement August 13, 2007, triggered this obligation, and
the Registrant intends to repay all outstanding principal and
interest under the loan by the end of August 2007. In connection
with the Bridge Loan, the Registrant paid to Brookstreet, as
finder, a fee in the amount of $50,000 and granted Brookstreet a
warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of the Registrants
common stock at an exercise price of $18.00 per share. The sale
of the above securities was considered to be exempt from
registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the
Securities Act, as transactions by an issuer not involving a
public offering. The purchaser of the securities was an
accredited investor, represented its intention to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were
affixed to the share certificates and instruments issued in the
transaction. The purchaser had adequate access, through its
relationship with the Registrant, to information about the
Registrant.
|
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) Exhibits
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1(i)
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
3
|
.1(ii)
|
|
Form of Bylaws of Registrant
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.8 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
(incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series A
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc., dated
April 21, 2004 (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series B
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, Inc., dated
June 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
II-3
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated Investors
Rights Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of Promissory Note issued to
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Equipment
and Soft Cost Loans) issued to Venture Lending &
Leasing IV, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Growth
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Working
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.13
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.3 filed with
Form 8-K
on August 13, 2007 (File No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP.
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between Registrant and its officers and directors (incorporated
by reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
1999 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
2000 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
2003 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
2004 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
and related form stock option plan agreements (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
2006 Stock Incentive Plan Notice
of Stock Unit Award and Stock and Stock Unit Agreement issued to
Robert Miller (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the
same number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
October 26, 1999, between Registrant and RNM Lakeville,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
II-4
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 1, dated September 15, 2000, between Registrant
and RNM Lakeville L.P. (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.8 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 2, dated July 29, 2005, between Registrant and RNM
Lakeville L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Lease,
dated August 23, 2006, between Registrant and RNM Lakeville
L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
May 15, 2005, between Oculus Technologies of Mexico, S.A.
de C.V. and Antonio Sergio Arturo Fernandez Valenzuela
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.10 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated July
2003, between Oculus Innovative Sciences, B.V. and Artikona
Holding B.V. (translated from Dutch) (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.11 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
March 25, 2004, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing III, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.12 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
June 14, 2006, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing IV, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.13 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Supplement
to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 29, 2007,
between Registrant and Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Hojabr Alimi
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Jim Schutz
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2004, between Registrant and Robert Miller
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2005, between Registrant and Bruce Thornton
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 10, 2006, between Registrant and Mike Wokasch
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.19 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Director Agreement
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Consultant Agreement, dated
October 1, 2005, by and between Registrant and White Moon
Medical (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 filed
with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Leasing Agreement, dated
May 5, 2006, made by and between Mr. Jose Alfonzo I.
Orozco Perez and Oculus Technologies of Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
II-5
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Registrant, Quimica Pasteur, S de
R.L., Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez and Jorge Paulino
Hermosillo Martin (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Framework Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Javier Orozco Gutierrez, Quimica
Pasteur, S de R.L., Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin, Registrant
and Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.25 filed with Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Mercantile Consignment Agreement,
dated June 16, 2005, between Oculus Technologies de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. and Francisco Javier
Orozco Gutierrez (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.26 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Partnership Interest Purchase
Option Agreement, dated June 16, 2005, between Registrant
and Javier Orozco Gutierrez (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.28 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.29 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
November 7, 2006, between Registrant and Robert Burlingame
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Non-Negotiable Secured Promissory
Note, dated November 10, 2006, between Registrant and
Robert Burlingame (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.31 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to
Non-Negotiable Secured Promissory Note, dated March 29,
2007, between Registrant and Robert Burlingame (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Subordination Agreement, dated
November 7, 2006, by and among Registrant, Robert
Burlingame, Venture Lending & Leasing III, LLC, and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.32 filed with Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to
Subordination Agreement, dated March 29, 2007, by and among
Registrant, Robert Burlingame, Venture Lending &
Leasing III, LLC, and Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
LLC (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Consulting Agreement, effective
November 9, 2006, by and between Registrant and Robert
Burlingame (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.33
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Director Agreement, dated
November 8, 2006, by and between Registrant and Robert
Burlingame (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.34
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Exclusive Marketing Agreement,
dated December 5, 2005, by and between Registrant and Alkem
Laboratories Ltd (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.35 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
II-6
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Settlement Agreement, effective
September 21, 2006, by and among Registrant and
Messrs. Jorge Ahumada Ayala and Fernando Ahumada Ayala
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.36 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Settlement Agreement, dated
October 25, 2006, by and between Registrant and
Mr. Kim Kelderman (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.37 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement,
dated August 7, 2007, by and among Registrant and the
purchasers identified therein (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 filed with
Form 8-K
on August 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated August 7, 2007, by and among Registrant and the
purchasers identified therein (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.2 filed with
Form 8-K
on August 13, 2007 (File
No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (incorporated
by reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Marcum &
Kliegman LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
|
24
|
.1*
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained in
page II-9).
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
| |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain
portions of this agreement. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement;
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement;
provided, however, that paragraphs (1)(i), (1)(ii) and (1)(iii)
do not apply if the information required to be included in a
post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in
reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the
registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of
the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the
registration statement, or is contained in a form of prospectus
filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) that is part of the
registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of the securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
II-7
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
that remain unsold at the termination of this offering.
(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act to any purchaser, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement
relating to an offering, other than registration statements
relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in
reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and
included in the registration statement as of the date it is
first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of
contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify
any statement that was made in the registration statement or
prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made
in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
(5) That, for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, each filing of the registrants annual
report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plans annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the SEC this form of indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against these liabilities (other than the
payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of this issue.
II-8
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Petaluma, State of California, on the
30th day of August, 2007.
Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc.
Hojabr Alimi
President and Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Hojabr
Alimi and James Schutz, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his or her name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities including his capacity as a
director
and/or
officer of Oculus Innovative Sciences, Inc., to sign any and all
amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this
registration statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed below by the following
persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hojabr
Alimi
Hojabr
Alimi
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
Miller
Robert
Miller
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Akihisa
Akao
Akihisa
Akao
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jay
Edward
Birnbaum
Jay
Edward Birnbaum
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
Brown
Edward
Brown
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
Burlingame
Robert
Burlingame
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
II-9
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
Conley
Richard
Conley
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Greg
French
Greg
French
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
Schutz
James
Schutz
|
|
Director
|
|
August 30, 2007
|
II-10
EXHIBIT INDEX
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1(i)
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
3
|
.1(ii)
|
|
Form of Bylaws of Registrant
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.8 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
(incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series A
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc., dated
April 21, 2004 (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Warrant to Purchase Series B
Preferred Stock of Registrant by and between Registrant and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, Inc., dated
June 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Amended and Restated Investors
Rights Agreement, effective as of September 14, 2006
(incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Form of Promissory Note issued to
Venture Lending & Leasing III, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Equipment
and Soft Cost Loans) issued to Venture Lending &
Leasing IV, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Growth
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Form of Promissory Note (Working
Capital Loans) issued to Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.12
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of
the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
4
|
.13
|
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common
Stock of Registrant (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.3 filed with Form 8-K on August 13,
2007 (File No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP.
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
between Registrant and its officers and directors (incorporated
by reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
1999 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
2000 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
2003 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
2004 Stock Plan and related form
stock option plan agreements (incorporated by reference to the
exhibit of the same number filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
and related form stock option plan agreements (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
2006 Stock Incentive Plan Notice
of Stock Unit Award and Stock and Stock Unit Agreement issued to
Robert Miller (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the
same number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
October 26, 1999, between Registrant and RNM Lakeville,
L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 1, dated September 15, 2000, between Registrant
and RNM Lakeville L.P. (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.8 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment to Office Lease
No. 2, dated July 29, 2005, between Registrant and RNM
Lakeville L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.9
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Lease,
dated August 23, 2006, between Registrant and RNM Lakeville
L.P. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated
May 15, 2005, between Oculus Technologies of Mexico, S.A.
de C.V. and Antonio Sergio Arturo Fernandez Valenzuela
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.10 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Office Lease Agreement, dated July
2003, between Oculus Innovative Sciences, B.V. and Artikona
Holding B.V. (translated from Dutch) (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.11 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
March 25, 2004, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing III, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.12 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
June 14, 2006, between Registrant and Venture
Lending & Leasing IV, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to exhibit 10.13 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Supplement
to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 29, 2007,
between Registrant and Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same
number filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Hojabr Alimi
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
January 1, 2004, between Registrant and Jim Schutz
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2004, between Registrant and Robert Miller
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 1, 2005, between Registrant and Bruce Thornton
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated
June 10, 2006, between Registrant and Mike Wokasch
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.19 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Director Agreement
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Consultant Agreement, dated
October 1, 2005, by and between Registrant and White Moon
Medical (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 filed
with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Leasing Agreement, dated
May 5, 2006, made by and between Mr. Jose Alfonzo I.
Orozco Perez and Oculus Technologies of Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Registrant, Quimica Pasteur, S de
R.L., Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez and Jorge Paulino
Hermosillo Martin (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.24 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Framework Agreement, dated
June 16, 2005, between Javier Orozco Gutierrez, Quimica
Pasteur, S de R.L., Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin, Registrant
and Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.25 filed with Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Mercantile Consignment Agreement,
dated June 16, 2005, between Oculus Technologies de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. and Francisco Javier
Orozco Gutierrez (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.26 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Partnership Interest Purchase
Option Agreement, dated June 16, 2005, between Registrant
and Javier Orozco Gutierrez (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.27 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Jorge Paulino Hermosillo Martin
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.28 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Termination of Registrant and
Oculus Technologies de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Agreements with
Quimica Pasteur, S de R.L. by Francisco Javier Orozco Gutierrez
(translated from Spanish) (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.29 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated
November 7, 2006, between Registrant and Robert Burlingame
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Non-Negotiable Secured Promissory
Note, dated November 10, 2006, between Registrant and
Robert Burlingame (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.31 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to
Non-Negotiable Secured Promissory Note, dated March 29,
2007, between Registrant and Robert Burlingame (incorporated by
reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Subordination Agreement, dated
November 7, 2006, by and among Registrant, Robert
Burlingame, Venture Lending & Leasing III, LLC, and
Venture Lending & Leasing IV, LLC (incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.32 filed with Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to
Subordination Agreement, dated March 29, 2007, by and among
Registrant, Robert Burlingame, Venture Lending &
Leasing III, LLC, and Venture Lending & Leasing IV,
LLC (incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number
filed with Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Consulting Agreement, effective
November 9, 2006, by and between Registrant and Robert
Burlingame (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.33
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Director Agreement, dated
November 8, 2006, by and between Registrant and Robert
Burlingame (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.34
filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Exclusive Marketing Agreement,
dated December 5, 2005, by and between Registrant and Alkem
Laboratories Ltd (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.35 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Settlement Agreement, effective
September 21, 2006, by and among Registrant and
Messrs. Jorge Ahumada Ayala and Fernando Ahumada Ayala
(incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.36 filed with
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Settlement Agreement, dated
October 25, 2006, by and between Registrant and
Mr. Kim Kelderman (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.37 filed with Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-135584),
as amended, declared effective on January 24, 2007).
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement,
dated August 7, 2007, by and among Registrant and the
purchasers identified therein (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.1 filed with
Form 8-K
on August 13, 2007
(File No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated August 7, 2007, by and among Registrant and the
purchasers identified therein (incorporated by reference to
exhibit 10.2 filed with
Form 8-K
on August 13, 2007
(File No. 001-33216)).
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (incorporated
by reference to the exhibit of the same number filed with Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on June 20, 2007 and amended on July 27, 2007).
|
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Marcum &
Kliegman LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
|
24
|
.1*
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained in
page II-9).
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
| |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain
portions of this agreement. |